SC gay sex ruling dubbed 'political', 'regressive'

Not many are hopeful of the parliament legalising gay sex

pujab

Puja Bhattacharjee | December 11, 2013




For years Joy had lived in the shadows. He struggled to be himself but the laws of the land forbade him to express his true identity. He longed to wear a skirt and makeup and carry a ladies handbag but harassment from people and the police made him resist his urges. Then in 2009, Delhi high court passed a historic judgment decriminalizing homosexuality. It was a euphoric moment for Joy and his family. Since then Joy felt no shame in identifying himself as a gay man.

Then on the morning of December 11, 2013, the ground was snatched from beneath his feet. The supreme court of India reversed the high court order. Joy and the rest of his community were back to square one.  

“The judgment sends a completely wrong message to the world. Human rights are suffering in this country,” says Madhura Chakraborty, co-founder Take Back the Night, Kolkata chapter.

Chakraborty feels that the way ahead is a long struggle. “The struggle must continue as it has continued before. I am not very hopeful of the parliament. We have to make more people aware,” she says.

“Every human being has the right to express their love. We were preparing to celebrate when the decision jolted us. The judgment is extremely regressive. The law represents social prejudice. The way right wing politics are making a comeback is a reason to worry for us,” says activist Dr Payoshni Mitra.

She adds the parliament is the next stop.

“We are devastated. We are trying to figure out what to do next. I have no hopes at the moment. We will have to rethink the entire situation,” says Paramita Chakrabarty, director, School of women’s studies, Jadavpur University.

Raina Roy a transgender woman says after the high court judgment the society was slowly changing. But post the supreme court judgment the police once again becomes tremendously powerful to harass them.

 “The judgment is very political in nature. The judgment came prior to the Lok sabha polls. But I am confident that this judgment will not last long,” she says.

Aniruddha Dutta,  an assistant professor at the University of Iowa and/or a researcher working on queer/trans issues in West Bengal summarizes discussions he has had in collaboration with trans communities in Kolkata in the following facebook post.

“While the SC richly deserves to be shamed, it’s not much use just blaming the Supreme Court. As many have pointed out, the campaign itself was deeply flawed to begin with. The petition and the positive verdict in 2009 itself deeply relied on the argument of privacy, thus protecting only a privileged few, and did not render any protection to public gender/sexual expression/identity, the most common target of violence and abuse. Even further, 377 as a law itself was very rarely used legally - a lot of police violence and arrests have been under other laws pertaining to public decency, sex work, etc., and most the cases of violence cited in the Naz petition and the 2009 judgment are only tangentially related to 377. Thus few people even within the police knew about it before the Naz petition and the ensuing case publicized it over the last decade or so. But now, the decade of publicity has made 377 from an obscure law into a potent weapon, which it wasn't so much initially. And now the effects will fall mostly on working class/lower caste trans*-gender variant-kothi-hijra people, who were never really consulted about strategy before 377 was made into this huge campaign mainly to benefit middle class gay/lesbian people who can afford to have sex in private."

Reactions on Twitter

“People have the right to sexuality. The SC has pushed us back to the Victorian, colonial era by upholding #377 & criminalising homosexuality,” wrote Siddharth Varadarajan.

“#377 verdict. When courts go with forces of patriarchal reaction rather than constitutional reason,” tweeted Kavitha Krishnan.

What a shocker from SC on #Sec377. A visionary judgement of Delhi HC set aside. Criminalising #LGBT deprives Indian citizens of liberty! -Sagarika Ghose

India banned love. Shame Shame! - Taslima Nasreen

The Supreme Court got it wrong today- Farhan Akhtar

So much for those believing the judiciary is 'the last bastion of common sense' in this country. -Rahul Bose
 

Comments

 

Other News

India lost Rs 52,000 crore to cyber fraud in five years: DoT

India has lost more than Rs 52,000 crore to cyber fraud over the last five years, officials have revealed. Out of approximately 60 lakh cyber fraud complaints received, more  than 3,000 cases have been resolved and six cyber fraud setups have been busted.   On the occ

India must not wait for its own Ella

In many Indian cities, children learn to wear masks before they are old enough to understand why. That reality should alarm us far more than it does.   In 2020, nine-year-old Ella Adoo Kissi Debrah became the first person in the world to have air pollution officially recognized a

An ode to the cradle of humankind

The Alphabets of Africa: Poems By Abhay K. Vintage Classics, 280 pages, ₹499.00   Abhay K

Ahmedabad district railway network to be expanded

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Wednesday approved the Ahmedabad (Sarkhej) – Dholera Semi High-Speed Double Line project of Ministry of Railways with total cost of Rs. 20,667 crore (approx.). It will be Indian Railways 1st semi high-speed project

Indian Ocean more contested than ever: Western Naval Command Chief

The Indian Ocean is becoming increasingly contested and strategically significant as the Indo-Pacific emerges as the defining geopolitical theatre of the 21st century, Vice Admiral Krishna Swaminathan, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command, has said.   Spe

Why the judiciary needs much more than four more judges

India has a particular form of governance theatre: the bold declaration that appears to be action but is actually a way of avoiding action. The Union Cabinet on May 5 approved a Bill to increase the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38. The decision has been touted as a step toward judici


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter