Some brands of nationalism can be injurious to your health!

Dinesh Thakur goes to court over medicine quality; drug controller wants whistleblowers to be nationalistic!

GN Bureau | March 8, 2016


#CDSCO   #Ranbaxy   #whistleblowers   #medicine quality   #Dinesh Thakur  


The next battle over ‘nationalism’ is beginning: apparently, if you criticise the dangerous state of drug manufacturing in India that can kill people, you might not be nationalistic.

Dinesh Thakur exposed Ranbaxy’s practices in the US, and the court imposed a fine of $500 million on the firm (and $48 million in compensation to him), might not have faced taunts there that his action was intended to benefit his country of origin. However, going to the supreme court here in India with the same concerns, Thakur will have to contend with “nationalism” before he could save some lives.

He has filed a PIL against the health ministry, the drugs consultative committee and the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), accusing them of failing to enforce drug safety rules in India, Reuters has reported.

While the case is listed for hearing on Friday, CDSCO chief GN Singh has been quoted as saying that India’s regulatory agencies respect and appreciate whistleblowers but their “intentions should be genuine, nationalistic”. On Twitter, Thakur’s response was:

Thakur was referring to the deaths of a number of women in sterlisation camps in Bilaspur of Chhattisgarh in late 2014 – due to fake medicines. Read Governance Now’s full ground report.

To appreciate Singh’s concerns, one can refer to his interview with the Business Standard soon after the US court’s Ranbaxy verdict. He had said in 2014 that if he applied the US FDA standards, he would have to shut almost all drug facilities.

Later, he told Governance Now that Ranbaxy in India had been asked to comply with all regulations.

Also read: Dirty medicine: Ranbaxy's FDA travails
 

 

Comments

 

Other News

India faces critical shortage of skin donors amid rising burn cases

India reports nearly 70 lakh burn injury cases every year, resulting in approximately 1.4 lakh deaths annually. Experts estimate that up to 50% of these lives could be saved with adequate access to skin donations.   A significant concern is that around 70% of burn victims fall wi

Not just politics, let`s discuss policies too

Why public policy matters Most days, India`s loudest debates stop at the ballot box. We can name every major leader and recall every campaign slogan. Still, far fewer of us can explain why a widow`s pension is delayed or how a government school`s budget is actually approved. That

When algorithms decide and children die

The images have not left me, of dead and wounded children being carried in the arms of the medics and relatives to the ambulances and hospitals. On February 28, at the start of Operation Epic Fury, cruise missiles struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh school – officially named a girls’ school, in Minab,

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter