Three non-UPA CMs question uniform criteria in food bill

In letters to the PM, they seek state-specific provisions and funds to implement food bill

prasanna

Prasanna Mohanty | February 14, 2013



The chief ministers of Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Uttar Pradesh have expressed their strong protest against the proposed food security bill in their letters to the prime minister.

Their main grouse ar1.jpege against some of the basic features of the bill – uniform exclusion criteria and limits in terms of percentage of population to be covered, fixing per capita entitlement in place of household entitlement, financial burden on the states and unilateral fixing of limits and eligibility.

Additionally, Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar has sought cash transfer instead of supply of food through the PDS and questioned the bill’s mere references to revitalisation of agriculture, procurement and storage process and access to drinking water, healthcare and sanitation without giving a roadmap or an action plan.

All the three chief ministers were reacting to the proposed bill following the parliamentary standing committee’s recommendations. The key points of the proposed bill are: restricting the number of beneficiaries to 50 percent of the urban and 75 percent of the rural population and per capita entitlement of 5 kg of food grain per month.

The centre is planning to introduce and pass the bill in the budget session.

Uttar Pradesh chief minister Akhilesh Yadav has, in his letter, pointed out that uniform restriction on the number of beneficiaries is unfair to a poor state like his as it has a larger share of people below the poverty line. He says the Tendulkar committee had shown that UP had 37.7 percent BPL families as against the national average of 29.8 percent. Besides, per capita income of UP for 2009-10 stood at Rs 23,392 while the na2.jpegtional average was Rs 46,117.

Yadav has in fact demanded universal coverage by seeking 100 percent coverage of the rural population and 95 percent of urban population.

Chhattisgarh chief minister Raman Singh is also opposed to an arbitrary fixing of the coverage in terms of percentage of population and says the Chhattisgarh Food Security Act, 2012, has done away with it.

He is also opposed to changing the entitlement to 5 kg per head, saying that this would fail to meet the need of families with less than five members. The entitlement should be fixed at 35 kg per household, instead.

It is Nitish Kumar’s letter that takes a more strident position, questioning the rationale of fixing an uniform criteria for all states, irrespective of their financial conditions and population of BPL families. He also questions the centre for not consulting the states while fixing limits or deciding the eligibility criteria.

As against Yadav and Singh, he is asking the centre to give cash transfers, rather than food, and bear the entire financial burden. He has suggested a BPL commission to identify, authenticate and update the BPL list in a transparent manner. In case the centre went for food, not cash, then it should provide funds to set up the required infrastructure.

Several other states have also questioned one exclusion criteria and limit for all states, per capita entitlement and additional financial burden the food bill will entail at a consultation meeting held with the food ministers of the states on Wednesday. Their suggestions were more in line with the issues raised by the chief ministers.

The MoS for food at the centre, KV Thomas, has assured the state ministers to revise the bill keeping their suggestions in mind.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Making sense of facts – and alternative facts

The Art of Conjuring Alternate Realities: How Information Warfare Shapes Your World By Shivam Shankar Singh and Anand Venkatanarayanan HarperCollins / 284 pages / Rs 599 Professor Noam Chomsky, linguist and public intellectual, has often spoken of &ls

The Manali Trance: Economics of Abandoning Caution in the Time of Coronavirus

The brutal second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India has left a significant death toll in its wake. Health experts advise that the imminent third wave can be delayed by following simple measures like wearing a mask and engaging in social distancing. However, near the end of the second wave, we witnesse

Govt considers fixing driving hrs of commercial vehicles

Union Minister of Road Transport and Highways Nitin Gadkari has emphasised deciding driving hours for truck drivers of commercial vehicles, similar to pilots, to reduce fatigue-induced road accidents. In a Na

Telecom department simplifies KYC processes for mobile users

In a step towards Telecom Reforms which aim to provide internet and tele connectivity for the marginalised section, the Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of Communica

Mumbai think tank calls for climate action

Raising concerns over rising seawater levels and climate change, Mumbai First, a 25-year-old public-private partnership policy think tank, has written letters to Maharashtra chief minister Uddhav Thackeray, minister for environment and climate change, tourism and protocol, Aditya Thackeray and Mumbai munic

Creation of ‘good bank’ as important as ‘bad bank’ for NPA management

After the recent announcement of the government guarantee for Security Receipts (SRs) to be issued by a public sector-owned National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL), there is a surge of interest around this desi version of a super bad bank. The entity will acquire around ₹2 trillion bad debts fr

Visionary Talk: Gurcharan Das, Author, Commentator & Public Intellectual on key governance issues


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter