Unique Identification Authority may be restructured, redefined

Dissolution of cabinet committee on unique identification authority of India indicates further reorganisation in the authority

shivangi-narayan

Shivangi Narayan | June 11, 2014



The Modi led NDA government has dissolved four cabinet committees including one on unique identification authority of India (UIDAI). The cabinet committee on economic affairs will now be its overseeing authority.
 
Though UIDAI maintains that the abolition of the committee is a routine administrative exercise of the government in line of its motto of ‘minimum government, maximum governance’, the move indicates further restructuring in the authority.
 
Previously union home minister Rajnath Singh had also hinted at a merger of UIDAI with national population register (NPR). The latter has a legal mandate to provide a national identity platform, which the UIDAI lacks.  
 
However, officials at the UIDAI claim that Aadhaar will get a legal mandate as soon as the government passes the pending bill in the parliament.
 
Further restructuring and reshaping of the authority, in the shape of dissolution of more committees, is also expected because UIDAI has been mired in controversy since the very beginning. It was not passed by the parliament when it was first introduced in Lok Sabha in 2010 after which it worked on an executive committee order. The parliamentary standing committee on finance led by Yashwant Sinha pointed out specific issues in the bill which, till now, have not been addressed.
 
Lack of data security and privacy riled Aadhaar enrolment with many privacy activists alleging that the intelligence agencies in the US such as the CIA had access to biometric data collected by UIDAI. Lack of a comprehensive data security and privacy law complicated the issue further. Sources in UIDAI claim that Nandan Nilekani, former chairman, UIDAI pushed for the data privacy bill to be passed in parliament but without success.
 
Lastly, the Aadhaar enrolment has had its fair set of issues with Aadhaar cards of trees and tables being generated in some cases.
 
The idea behind a unique identity for all citizens to plug gaps in disbursal of subsidies should not be mixed with the issues it faces on ground. However, a complete restructuration of the authority might help in it actually achieving some of its proposed targets.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter