US nudge led to Indo-Pak talks: Advani

But "no concrete outcome is possible till Pakistan abandons terrorism"

PTI | March 2, 2010



Accusing the Manmohan Singh government of making a U-turn on holding talks with Pakistan following US "nudge", senior BJP leader L K Advani has said that no concrete outcome is possible in any dialogue till that country abandons terrorism.

Terming the UPA's stand on Indo-Pak talks as a "self-inflicted insult", he said the only outcome that seemed to have emerged from the recent Foreign Secretary-level talks was that they will stay in touch.

"Our Foreign Secretary called the recently concluded meeting 'constructive' but her Pakistani counterpart ridiculed the meeting and said his country did not believe in 'cosmetic engagement' and did not want India to 'lecture' them by demanding that Pakistan should 'do this or that'," Advani said in his latest blog posting titled 'UPA's shabby approach to Indo-Pak talks : A self-inflicted insult'.

Taking a dig at the Government on the outcome of the talks, Advani said in his statement to Parliament External Affairs Minister S M Krishna described the meeting as constructive and useful.

"But the only concrete outcome that seemed to emerge from the 500-word statement was the Foreign Secretaries agreement to stay in touch," the BJP leader said.

He said India's "U-turn" on the issue of dialogue with Pakistan seems to be the upshot of "Washington's nudge."

The "firmness" shown by the NDA government in dealing with Pakistan bore fruits in the form of a joint statement in which Islamabad assured that it would not permit Pakistan or any territory in Pakistan's control to be used to support terrorism in any manner, he said. .

The Chairman of BJP's Parliamentary Party wondered whether the dialogue is linked with Pakistan abandoning terrorism, "or have the two been de-linked as was clearly said by our PM at Sharm-el-Sheikh?"

Advani said while in the Sharm-el-Sheikh joint statement, issued after Singh's talks with his Pakistani counterpart Yousaf Raza Gilani, "at least there was clarity; in this latest one, there is nothing but contradictions and obfuscation."

Advani said when terror stalks India, having no dialogue is a legitimate diplomatic option. The BJP had taken this line in its resolution on Jammu and Kashmir in the National Council meeting at Indore.

Referring to the Agra summit, Advani said when General Pervez Musharraf returned from the Agra summit in July 2001 he was "very angry" with the Indian Government for having invited him and sent him back empty-handed, without even a joint statement containing some "goody goody observations about Indo-Pak amity."

He said it was then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's uncompromising stand at Agra regarding cross border terrorism that fetched him "historical triumph".

"In January 2004 after the SAARC conference General Musharraf made a joint statement with Shri Vajpayee at Islamabad taking a position on terrorism absolutely different from the one he took at Agra, and assuring Vajpayee that he would not permit Pakistan or any territory in Pakistan's control to be used to support terrorism in any manner," he wrote in the blog.

Comments

 

Other News

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter