Why not make rich farmers pay tax? -Governance Now

Why not make rich farmers pay tax?

The top one percent farmers earn several times more than an average salaried taxpayer

Ashish Mehta | January 2, 2019 | Delhi

#india agriculture #rural distress #income tax #agriculture tax #agriculture income #farmer tax

Illustration: Ashish Asthana

Before Narendra Modi replied with the now-famous greeting of “Puducherry ko Vanakkam”, a BJP worker was telling him in a party-organised video conference that the government was “only busy collecting tax in all manner and in all ways,”, creating much discomfort to the middle class. But a single-minded focus on taxes may not be a bad idea after all. The government has been relentlessly at work to increase its revenues, so that it has more money on hand to spend – be it on infrastructure or on welfare spending. That is why the two biggest, boldest decisions on the economic front – demonetisation and GST – both relate to taxes. Here is a third bold idea: tax agriculture.

Middle-class people, mostly salaried folks, have long felt that they have been bearing too great a burden of earning for the nation-building. A small upper class always finds ways to dodge taxes, and the larger lower middle class is rightly out of the tax net. Thus, direct taxes are paid by about six crore (or less: not all returns filed result in actual taxes). You could be earning barely Rs 3 lakh, and yet you have to cough up taxes. On top of that, the middle class, as consumers, also ends up paying up a large share of indirect taxes, be it various kinds of cess or the passed-on duties.

Think

If India wants raise the tax-GDP ratio from about 16 percent to 22 percent, as NITI Aayog envisions, new tax options will have to be explored

. . .

The top one percent farmers earn several times more than an average salaried taxpayer

On the other hand, a big class of people make money tax-free. Though agriculture does attract a variety of taxes and the states are free to impose some more, the income from it is free at the central level. Since a majority of the farmers are poor and depend on the vagaries of nature to make a living, the idea of taxing agriculture income seems cruel if not outright inhuman. However, like the personal income tax for the salaried class, a high limit can be proposed so that most farmers continue to be unaffected.

A majority of farmers in India have very small landholding, and those with more than four hectares of land form barely four percent of the total farming families – but they make 20 percent of the total agriculture income. When an income-tax payer with an annual income of Rs 3 lakh goes to work in a city bus, there are farmers who run a business enterprise equivalent of a small firm. Why shouldn’t they pay for the nation-building? More so, when the government has promised to double the farmers’ income and theirs too will double.

In November, NITI Aayog published ‘Strategies for a new India’ with 41 recommendations. A crucial one is to raise the tax-to-GDP ratio. It notes, “India’s tax-GDP ratio of around 17 percent is half the average of OECD countries (35 percent) and is low even when compared to other emerging economies like Brazil (34 percent), South Africa (27 percent) and China (22 percent). To enhance public investment, India should aim to increase its tax-GDP ratio to at least 22 percent of GDP by 2022-23.” The governments so far have explored all avenues to extract taxes, and one of the few left on the menu is agriculture.

With right conditions and restrictions, taxing agricultural income can be a the ultimate bold move in the economic arena. It will be a great leveller too.

Reality Check

These are the days of the loan waiver: manifestoes promise it, elections are won or lost on it, and parties are in competition to prove that one has waived more loans than the other has. Debating whether loan waivers are good for the economy or not would itself be a bold move. Against this background, can anyone imagine a party promising tax on agricultural income?

[email protected]

(The article appears in January 15, 2019 edition)

Comments

Other News

Delhi moves to real-time traffic management

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA), chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, has approved implementation of the ITMS Project by Delhi Police at an estimated cost of Rs.1,789.52 crore, inclusive of taxes. The project will cover 42 identified traffic corridors and will be implemented in three

MDR on UPI: Can sustainability come without weakening the network?

The extraordinary transaction volumes and value (₹29.82 Lakh crore in August 2026 alone) of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) have made it not only an Indian success story, but a global one. In 2024, UPI accounted for nearly 49% of the world’s real-time payment transaction volume, with more th

The Xi-Trump summit: The unending rivalry

Diplomacy is akin to an art, wherein the summitry, conflict resolution and negotiations form apt constituents of the entire context of deal making and “playing for keeps” in the international arena. The Xi-Trump summit in Washington last week, in which the American president broke all conside

“Indians, yet treated like outsiders”

Moving to Delhi-NCR for education can be an exciting experience for students from Northeast India. It gives us a chance to meet new people, experience a different culture and become more independent. But living away from home also comes with challenges that people who have not experienced them may not al

Import duty on major edible oils cut

The government has reduced the Basic Customs Duty (BCD) on major imported crude edible oils with a view to moderating domestic edible oil prices, providing relief to consumers and mitigating inflationary pressures arising from the sharp increase in international edible oil prices.

From pyramid to platform: BRICS agenda for Global South

In his opening address at the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi on September 12, prime minister Narendra Modi did something India`s diplomacy has been building towards for three years: he moved the ‘Voice of the Global South’ from a slogan to a work plan. Addressing the leaders, he argued that t