Is all speech safe unless attacked on social media?

Many Indians, if not a majority, never get to exercise their right to free speech throughout their life. Why aren’t we angry at that?

shivangi-narayan

Shivangi Narayan | December 3, 2012



A lot has been said, discussed, debated over and argued on regarding free speech over the last few days. Last month’s arrest of two young women in Palghar, Maharashtra, over a Facebook post following Bal Thackeray’s death was the incident that really broke the camel’s back. What civil society has been fussing over for a long time culminated in an incident where everyone got a chance to point to the other and say, “I told you so!”

Within hours of the arrests, and in a manner not quite unexpected, the country rose to the occasion as one and took over the case of free speech and a citizen’s right to use it. People quoted Article 19(1)A of the Constitution like a holy sermon, and both social and traditional media were aflame. The furore led Kapil Sibal to introduce conditions in Section 66A of the IT Act to ensure people are not unnecessarily harassed by it.

I am with the Palghar girls, and it is true that we cannot even begin to understand the extent to which they suffered because of an unlawful arrest. Everyone knows they will have to bear the repercussions of that day for the rest of their lives.

However, this whole argument for the cause of free speech is so elitist and classist that it stinks.

What is free speech, really? While it is not to demean even a single individual’s rights, why is it that we stand up and take notice only when the ‘free speech’ of our Facebook and Twitter brethren is threatened?

Every day, thousands of people die without being able to express themselves in public — so much that they forget what their real emotions are. Millions of women are never heard. Millions of dalits are told what to do — day in and day out. Millions of middle class employees have come to terms with the reality that they can never say the “right thing” in front of their bosses. Millions of students cannot tell their professors how wrong they are.

So why, as a country, are we not outraged when the rights of these ‘ordinary’ people, the ones not elite enough to hit the social media, are in danger? Why do we reach in hordes to join a candle light vigil for the murder of some but none of us have the time for the hundreds of children, raped, killed and thrown in a gutter in a village called Nithari? 

Why don’t we react to something unless it guarantees us our 15 minutes of fame? How selective can our selective rage get?

Comments

 

Other News

How social media is reshaping elections

Since Brazil’s return to direct presidential elections in 1985, no candidate who finished second in the first round of polling had ever won the presidency. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, now 81, has just done it. What explains the comeback, and what changed in Brazilian politics to make it possi

Cabinet approves Dearness Allowance, Dearness Relief

The union cabinet chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday approved the release of an additional instalment of Dearness Allowance (DA) to central government employees and Dearness Relief (DR) to pensioners with effect from 01.07.2026 representing an increase of 3% over the existing rates of 6

Cyclone Arnab strikes Andhra as warming oceans amplify storm risks

Cyclone Arnab made landfall along the Andhra Pradesh and Yanam coasts in the early hours of Wednesday as a very severe cyclonic storm, with maximum sustained wind speeds of 125–135 kmph and gusts reaching 150 kmph. Its rapid intensification has raised concerns about how warmer oceans, global warmin

Counting matters but which ones?

The first instinct of public policy is to count. Its harder task is to count what counts. We have become remarkably good at measuring the reach of the welfare state vis-à-vis beneficiaries covered, rupees transferred, houses built, connections installed and services delivered. But some of the most

Inching closer to a trade deal with America

The cooperation between India and the United States goes back quite a time. We need to relegate that era to the backburner when Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru visited US in the times of president Dwight Eisenhower and called the American let-off of 10 million dollars in defence aid to Pakistan as a “gun w

Manch vs Musk: Forty people and a foreign billionaire

About forty people walked the roundabout on Teen Murti Marg to the gate of Chanakyapuri police station, a distance you could cover in under a minute, on Friday to protest against Elon Musk’s Starlink. The walk was called by the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch. Nobody joined them on the way, and nobody seeme

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter