Is all speech safe unless attacked on social media?

Many Indians, if not a majority, never get to exercise their right to free speech throughout their life. Why aren’t we angry at that?

shivangi-narayan

Shivangi Narayan | December 3, 2012



A lot has been said, discussed, debated over and argued on regarding free speech over the last few days. Last month’s arrest of two young women in Palghar, Maharashtra, over a Facebook post following Bal Thackeray’s death was the incident that really broke the camel’s back. What civil society has been fussing over for a long time culminated in an incident where everyone got a chance to point to the other and say, “I told you so!”

Within hours of the arrests, and in a manner not quite unexpected, the country rose to the occasion as one and took over the case of free speech and a citizen’s right to use it. People quoted Article 19(1)A of the Constitution like a holy sermon, and both social and traditional media were aflame. The furore led Kapil Sibal to introduce conditions in Section 66A of the IT Act to ensure people are not unnecessarily harassed by it.

I am with the Palghar girls, and it is true that we cannot even begin to understand the extent to which they suffered because of an unlawful arrest. Everyone knows they will have to bear the repercussions of that day for the rest of their lives.

However, this whole argument for the cause of free speech is so elitist and classist that it stinks.

What is free speech, really? While it is not to demean even a single individual’s rights, why is it that we stand up and take notice only when the ‘free speech’ of our Facebook and Twitter brethren is threatened?

Every day, thousands of people die without being able to express themselves in public — so much that they forget what their real emotions are. Millions of women are never heard. Millions of dalits are told what to do — day in and day out. Millions of middle class employees have come to terms with the reality that they can never say the “right thing” in front of their bosses. Millions of students cannot tell their professors how wrong they are.

So why, as a country, are we not outraged when the rights of these ‘ordinary’ people, the ones not elite enough to hit the social media, are in danger? Why do we reach in hordes to join a candle light vigil for the murder of some but none of us have the time for the hundreds of children, raped, killed and thrown in a gutter in a village called Nithari? 

Why don’t we react to something unless it guarantees us our 15 minutes of fame? How selective can our selective rage get?

Comments

 

Other News

“Cancer is just a mind game”

Dr. Ananda Shankar Jayant, a Padma Shri awardee, inspired audiences for decades through her mastery of Bharatanatyam and Kuchipudi. But it was her journey through cancer that taught some of life`s most powerful lessons in courage and resilience.

Why Swami Vivekananda is the pathfinder for our times

Swami Vivekananda for Our Times  Edited and compiled by Rajiv Sikri, with Introduction by S. Gurumurthy Rupa Publications, 552 pages, Rs 695  

Five ways to realise the potential of India’s handicraft and handloom sector

India`s economic ambitions are increasingly defined by the industries of the future. Semiconductors, electronics, artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing dominate policy conversations. Yet one of India`s largest employment-intensive sectors continues to occupy a surprisingly marginal place in ec

Beyond toilets: Why open defecation persists in rural India

Despite the awareness campaigns on sanitation across India, open defecation (OD) is practised openly and widely in both rural and urban areas. Research shows that rural respondents are well aware of the negative impacts of OD, yet this awareness does not lead to toilet construction or use. In rural North I

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake

What the US–Iran peace deal means for India

After months of rising tensions, the United States and Iran have reached a memorandum of understanding called the "Islamabad Agreement." This agreement allows for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and provides Iran with relief from sanctions, depending on its complianc





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter