The body and the politics

Objectification of a woman’s body has become so commonplace that UP minister Rajaram Pandey does not even realise that he has made a mistake

shivangi-narayan

Shivangi Narayan | February 7, 2013



The refrain — yes, that’s what it has become — “treat women with respect” has reached such levels that now the only reaction it elicits is that of psychic numbing.

So, now it is UP minister Rajaram Pandey, who praised a district magistrate for her beauty — and for possessing a perfect body. Pandeyji is happy that every time he comes to Sultanpur there is a woman DM there for his service. And not just any woman DM; one who is beautiful and has a great body.

Now don’t cringe. There is nothing wrong about praising a woman for her body. In fact, the large number of fitness institutes in the country and the constant question lingering in a woman’s head — “Am I looking fat?” — which scares her to her soul, tells us that a woman would fly to the moon in happiness if she were praised about her body.

Except that she doesn’t. Except that praising a woman, or for that matter even a man, about their body is a very personal thing.

Doing that on a public platform not only shows your insensitivity, Pandeyji — and that appreciation for you is only skin deep — but also shows a deeper malaise of objectification of a woman’s body, which has become such a norm in today’s society that no one even notices how wrong it is. Scantily clad women seem to be selling everything on television these days — products they have got nothing to do with, such as men’s shaving razor, and selling them well.

Praising a woman about her looks when she is present in a gathering in her professional capacity is similar to degrading her professional abilities, and just because she is not beautiful enough. For example, leaders like Mayawati, who cannot communicate their way of working to many people because they are not beautiful enough. Or like Hilary Clinton, who could only capture as much news time on American television, during the nomination debates, as the length of the skirt allowed her to do.

Or for that matter Hina Rabbani Khar, who again is so pretty that that was all the media and people could look at and talk about.

Beauty, poise and chic are qualities to be appreciated. Ministers can be so pretty that your heart skips a beat when you look at them (case in point Shashi Tharoor). But judging them, or for that matter any professional, for their looks, or for the lack of them, makes evolution look like a serious conspiracy.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter