Classic case of negative cross branding

BJP wipes out a huge BE (Brand Equity) gained (for itself) in a day - in just a day. Alas, it deprives all Indians, a good chance of reaping the benefit from the noble thought of PM Narendra Modi

adve-srinivasa-bhat

Adve Srinivasa Bhat | September 24, 2014



BJP wipes out a huge BE (Brand Equity) gained (for itself) in a day - in just a day. Alas it deprives us all – all Indians – a very good chance of reaping the benefit from the noble thought of the Prime Minister – Shri Narendra Modi.

That thought was indeed exemplary and highly actionable. For sure, the deeper sense in that must have kindled certain pleasant and a hopeful feeling in every Indian irrespective of the religion he/she belongs to. Early reports in the media on the responses on the thought proves its potential for working with it expansively towards creating a more harmonious nation – bolstering the pursuit of nation development for the happiness of all sections of the society. 

In business, cross branding is tried between or with a set of brands belonging to a group or partnered with other brands for deriving relative brand advantages. Rarely cross branding is tried abusing rival brands notoriously for clinching a certain brand advantage. Cross branding in another lesser known sense refers to negative moves that diminish brand equity which essentially happen owing ignorance about branding and sheer greed. 

In politics, negative cross branding is in fact the undying trait that is practiced rampantly between political parties and their factions and also at individual levels within the parties. In spite of the task of serving a highly mature product (rule by the nation’s constitution) politics seem to thrive on habitually negative cross branding owing to grossly immature market (larger ignorant populace) and willful immature competition (self-serving political parties). 

But politics, as also true of most other countries – particularly the developing ones, is an indulgent occupation ‘for’ fulfilling the narrow interests of a very, very few, ‘by’ themselves, at the cost of vast populace.

 

Comments

 

Other News

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi

New pathways for tourism growth

Traditionally, India’s tourism policy has been based on three main components: the number of visitors, building tourist attractions and providing facilities for tourists. Due to the increase in climate-related issues and environmental destruction that occurred over previous years, policymakers have b

Is the US a superpower anymore?

On April 8, hours after warning that “a whole civilisation will die tonight,” US president Donald Trump, exhibiting his unique style of retreating from high-voltage brinkmanship, announced that he agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The weekend talks in Islamabad have failed and the futur


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter