Congress bites into Manmohanomics, at last

Sonia, Rahul share stage, page with PM on FDI in retail, other reform measures — officially

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | November 5, 2012



But for the grey tone and the smoggy haze of a lazy Sunday morning, the setting couldn’t have been more perfect for the Congress to go all guns blazing with big-ticket reforms: a massive 1 lakh-plus crowd at Delhi’s historic Ramlila Maidan and a power-packed dais comprising Prime minister Manmohan Singh, UPA chairperson and Congress president Sonia Gandhi and the party’s PM-in-waiting Rahul Gandhi.

While both Sonia and Rahul have shared the stage with Singh on many previous occasions, this was perhaps the first time they were on the same page so far as the reform measures are concerned. And hard-selling the trio sure did try. Taking the aggressive posture she has unleashed since the washed-out monsoon session of Parliament, Sonia tore into the opposition for stonewalling the reform measures, particularly foreign direct investment (FDI) in the retail sector.

“There is need to provide jobs annually to 80 lakh youths in the country, for which we need new investment and initiatives like FDI in retail,” the Congress chief, known for and seen as advocating social reform measures, said.

Opening the sector to retail giants like Walmart will help improve agriculture supply chain and also create jobs for the country’s youth, she stressed. “This (FDI in retail sector) will help not just farmers but also the citizens and youth,” Sonia said.

She told the crowd that the UPA government is still giving subsidies on petroleum products and urea, and has not raised prices of wheat and rice despite the tight fiscal situation.

Son Rahul also gave the reform measures, particularly retail FDI, a firm thumb-up: "We need economic reforms because only when businesses operate well will there be progress, and then we can run programmes to benefit the poor. The world is saying that India is standing up. The (country’s) youth will show not just India but also the whole world the way forward."

He also promised to help push policy changes that will “transform” India's retail sector by allowing global giants like Walmart and Tesco to open here.

But if he was dreaming of getting the BJP and its allies on the retail FDI bus by invoking Congress’s support to the NDA during the Kargil war, he was, well, dreaming. For, within hours, the Shiv Sena mocked his idealism and said the party will continue to oppose the Amethi MP’s "friends", indicating the likes of Walmart and Tesco.

"Rahul's 'friends' like Walmart were eager to enter the Indian markets for their benefit," Sena spokesperson Sanjay Raut said on Monday. "The NDA will not allow this to happen, and (our) opposition to FDI in retail will continue."

Shrugging off his silence mode, the PM told the crowd that there will be adequate funds to finance out welfare schemes and create jobs only when the economy is in vigorous state. Calling the charge that FDI in retail would wipe out small shops, or mom and pop stores, as they are dubbed by the western media, “lies being peddled” by the opposition, Singh said foreign investment in the sector will benefit “both aam aadmi and the kisan”.

He also stressed that though diesel and petrol prices have been raised, primarily to arrest the ever-growing subsidy bill since nearly 80 percent of India’s petro products need to be imported, adding that the UPA government still did not touch prices of kerosene, which fires the cooking ovens of the “aam aadmi”.

While there was nothing substantially novel or revolutionary in either the arguments forwarded by the Big Three or the criticism that immediately followed from the opposition camps, what Sunday’s Ramlila rally did was junk the perception that the Congress’s truck with the “aam admi” was at crossroads to Manmohan Singh’s economic reforms. The twain, the trio said, with an air of finality, has met.

As political analyst BG Verghese told the Wall Street Journal: “With the political backing, the government can now attempt to push through contentious reform measures such as the higher foreign investment in insurance, and similar moves in the pensions sector.”

Comments

 

Other News

India faces critical shortage of skin donors amid rising burn cases

India reports nearly 70 lakh burn injury cases every year, resulting in approximately 1.4 lakh deaths annually. Experts estimate that up to 50% of these lives could be saved with adequate access to skin donations.   A significant concern is that around 70% of burn victims fall wi

Not just politics, let`s discuss policies too

Why public policy matters Most days, India`s loudest debates stop at the ballot box. We can name every major leader and recall every campaign slogan. Still, far fewer of us can explain why a widow`s pension is delayed or how a government school`s budget is actually approved. That

When algorithms decide and children die

The images have not left me, of dead and wounded children being carried in the arms of the medics and relatives to the ambulances and hospitals. On February 28, at the start of Operation Epic Fury, cruise missiles struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh school – officially named a girls’ school, in Minab,

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter