Davuluri or Katrina, not just an innocent choice

The debate on dark is beautiful needs to continue to not let the ‘fair forces’ get the better of us

shivangi-narayan

Shivangi Narayan | September 17, 2013



That Miss America Nina Davuluri would not be able to become a Bollywood actress because the producer would prefer a fair girl over her due to market demands is giving the market too much credit. Too much credit for being too fair and for acting on forces outside of itself.

The market does not work on an already created need, affinity or both but has mechanisms to create its own. 'If you don't have an iPhone, well you don't have an iPhone' loosely translates to you are a worthless fool if you don't have an iPhone. Better get one soon or suffer being obsolete.

The market, thus, also creates and perpetuates a natural affinity of Indians to fair skin. It perpetuates it into a need and as something that can make or break your life if you don't have it. The ‘Fair and Lovely’ ads all do it. And it takes a discerning and rational mind to understand that seriously – you don't become a successful singer just because you are fair.

But the market makes most of us believe this way. Extending the same argument, Katrina Kaif, without any acting talent or skills to deliver dialogues in Hindi whatsoever becomes the number one actress. It is not Katrina's mistake or of the viewer who loves her dancing on the screen. The choices have been made long ago and the fairness market will leave no stones unturned to maintain them that way.

There is serious money in the fairness business and unless women don't have their lives attached to them, how is the industry going to thrive?

ALSO READ: Dear Miss America, no offences but little reason to blame Bollywood if it doesn't want to cast you

This is the reason why people need to be allowed to ask Bollywood about why there may not be space for people like Davuluri for being the leading ladies. Why do people have to believe that only a certain complexion/body type is beautiful, or more apt, for the big screen? More importantly, why would more and more people be made to believe that only a certain body type is beautiful, or more apt for the big screen?

People who are voicing their opinion against those who are criticising Nina Davuluri need to do that to maintain spaces that allow for debates on different body images. This debate is needed to balance the powerful forces of the market which, if left to itself, will tilt everyone's heads to look in the fair direction.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Caring for cancer patients: the expanded network of facilities

Health is a State subject, and the primary responsibility for providing healthcare services, including cancer care, rests with the respective state governments. However, the Department of Health and Family Welfare provides technical and financial support to States and Union Territories across the country

Capabilities, aspirations of India’s youth limitless: Modi

The capabilities and aspirations of India’s youth are limitless, prime minister Narendra Modi said in his remarks to the media at the start of monsoon session of the parliament on Monday.  "In the past month, the country has achieved many milestones, filling citiz

India gets the first hydrogen train

Prime minister Narendra Modi on Friday laid the foundation stone and dedicated to the nation various development projects worth around ₹14,700 crore in Jind, Haryana.   The PM positioned the city as a shining reflection of the good governance model. Emphasizing that the entire Haryana

Climate change is stealing sleep

Climate change has at least doubled the temperature-related sleep loss across 1,338 major cities worldwide over the past five decades, highlighting an emerging but often overlooked public health consequence of rising global temperatures. A new study by Climate Central estimates that between 2020 and

Cabinet approves Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme

The union cabinet chaired by PM Narendra Modi has approved the Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme (MPMS) with a budgetary outlay of Rs 62,500 crore. It aims to further scale up the production, deepen domestic value addition, strengthen supply chain resilience, enhance global competitiveness. It

Building infrastructure is only half the job

Recent stories of stolen railway wires, disappearing communication towers and missing public infrastructure are often treated as bizarre law-and-order failures of India. Yet they raise a more fundamental question. Why does the State often discover the disappearance of a public asset only after it has alrea

Upcoming Conferences





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter