Faced with the Brahminism of IITs

In opposing a joint entrance exam, IITs have betrayed a scientific temper to reveal their true elitist nature


Pankaj Kumar | June 11, 2012

Elitism seems to be a deeply ingrained trait which is difficult to dispense with among human organisations. That seems to be the case with the prestigious Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) which have been consistently resisting an attempt to hold a joint entrance test for admission of engineering graduates. IIT-Kanpur and also a few other IITs have raised the banner of revolt against the idea which is yet to take off the ground.

The council of IITs proposed a common entrance aptitude test for admission in IITs and other engineering colleges from 2013 onwards. This will replace the current mode of IIT entrance examination and 15-odd separate tests for admission of students in state engineering institutes and private colleges.

In fact, the common entrance test is devised to facilitate students to get a single-point clearance for their admission on the basis of merit. Union HRD Minister Kapil Sibal endorsed the idea of holding such a test which would ultimately regulate the admission for the engineering course aspirants. Obviously, the proposed test needs approval by the central advisory board of education and the state government given the fact the education is a state subject.

Much before the proposal could be concretised into an action, IIT-Kanpur director and faculty members of the other IITs raised a storm. The senate of IIT-Kanpur steadfastly refused to kowtow to the proposal approved by the HRD ministry. This was followed up by similar resistance by faculty of the other IITs. The apparent reason for the resistance is that the joint entrance test for engineering courses would compromise the standard of the IITs. This assessment goes against the proposal which was unanimously approved by the councils of the IIT, NIT, NIIT and certain state institutions.

As of now, the objections raised by the IITs over the entrance test seem quite superficial. Even some of the senior faculty members are bewildered over the resistance to evolution of a new method of entrance test. They are equally baffled to understand the logic that the test would compromise the high standards of education in the IITs. On the other hand, they feel the joint entrance test would enable a large number of aspirants to pool in their resources and put in their best for the test which will be highly regulated and conducted by professionals.

However, all these arguments are not cutting ice with the IITians who relish the tag of elitism that comes with the prestigious institutes. Despite the fact that IITs are lacking in basic infrastructure and facing acute dearth of qualified faculty, the focus of the ongoing debate on India’s premier institutes has been shifted to an issue which has nothing to do with upgrading the quality of education. Apparently, this is not a good sign for future of India’s technological education.

If indeed the brand value of the IITs depends on the quality (or toughness) of its joint entrance exam (JEE), then shouldn't the IITians be fighting to maintain that level of rigour so that other engineering institutions across the country rise to the level of the IITs? Or should they be fighting to keep the rest at arm’s length?

To argue that clubbing the IITs with other engineering “dalits” will diminish the standard of education of the former is to have very little confidence in the so-called greatness of the IIT-model of education. Is the IIT standard is so fickle that by a mere touch from the lesser institutions at the joint entrance exam level, the IIT brand will be sullied beyond redemption?

India is proud of its IITs and nothing should be done to drop their standards of education or dilute their brand. But everything must be done to raise the rest to the level of the IITs. As long as the IITs can keep evolving and improving to be better than the rest, they deserve to be at the top. But they cannot demand to stay at the top only to perpetuate a certain brahminical order in engineering education.



Other News

Voter turnout: Drop from 2019 reduces further

As the voting percentages dropped drastically in the first couple of phases of the ongoing general elections, observers and analysts spoke of ‘voter apathy’ blamed it on a lack of “wave” this time – apart from the heatwave, that is. The latest figures after the fourth phase, h

GAIL reports annual revenue of Rs.1,30,638 crore

GAIL (INDIA) Limited has reported 75% increase in Profit before Tax (PBT) of Rs.11,555 crore in FY24,  as against Rs 6,584 Cr in FY23. Profit after Tax (PAT) in FY24 stands at Rs. 8,836 Cr as against Rs.5,302 Cr in FY23, a 67 % increase. However, revenue from operations registered a fa

Women move forward, one step at a time

“Women’s rights are not a privilege but a fundamental aspect of human rights.” —Savitribai Phule In India, where almost two-thirds of the population resides in rural areas, women’s empowerment initiatives are extremely critical for intensifying l

Why you should vote

What are the direct tangible benefits that you want from the government coming in power? The manifestos of various parties set a host of agendas which many times falls back in materialising the intended gains. Governance failures, policy lapses, implementation gaps, leadership crisis and cultural blockages

How the role of Ayurveda evolved pre- and post-independence

Ayurveda, Nation and Society: United Provinces, c. 1890–1950 By Saurav Kumar Rai Orient BlackSwan, 292 pages, Rs 1,400  

General Elections: Phase 4 voting on in 96 seats

As many as 17.7 crore electors are eligible to vote in the fourth phase of general elections taking place on Monday in 10 states/UTs. 175 Legislative Assembly seats of Andhra Pradesh and 28 Legislative Assembly seats of Odisha are also going to polls in this phase. Polling time in select as

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now


Current Issue


Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter