Forced philanthropy

Encouraging CSR is welcome, but mandating it will lead to avoidable complications

ashishm

Ashish Mehta | February 14, 2011



The corporate affairs ministry has initiated a healthy debate on corporate social responsibility that has thrown up several ideas. The latest among them is that companies with a turnover of Rs 1,000 crore or more (or net profit of Rs 5 crore or more) should set aside two percent of the net profit for CSR. The parliamentary standing committee on finance headed by former finance minister Yashwant Sinha has made this recommendation and the ministry has agreed to incorporate it in the companies bill, according to media reports.

India Inc. has, predictably, opposed the move. Many established industrial houses have been known for their exemplary charitable works. Of late, new economy players too have woken up to the charms of CSR for the right branding. It makes business sense to spend on causes like climate change for which a degree of awareness has built up. What the companies resent is being forced to spend a substantial amount on the kind of activities that the law will define as CSR.

While corporates, like everybody else, have responsibility towards society, they are after all in the business of business. If they do their business ethically and in a socially responsible manner, that should be sufficient. It would be better to have a non-polluting unit that does not spend on CSR rather than a highly polluting one that allocates a large sum of money to some NGO to plant trees in some faraway region.

If it is a question of generating resources for socially responsible initiatives, then taxes are supposed to be doing precisely that job. It would be better to let companies earn more and pay more taxes, which the state can put to the best use. The proposed scheme of things will only create a market for CSR work, in which players with varying degrees of credibility will provide services.

The two-percent proposal also invites comparisons with the Posco case. The environment ministry has asked the steel major to spend two percent of its profits on CSR to offset any adverse impact its plant may have in the region. This is quite common in the coal and mining sector. But generalising it for all companies across sectors would be tantamount to treating, say, Infosys as a Posco of sorts. That will be unfair. In any case, donation should not buy you atonement for your sins.

Comments

 

Other News

Indian Ocean more contested than ever: Western Naval Command Chief

The Indian Ocean is becoming increasingly contested and strategically significant as the Indo-Pacific emerges as the defining geopolitical theatre of the 21st century, Vice Admiral Krishna Swaminathan, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command, has said.   Spe

Why the judiciary needs much more than four more judges

India has a particular form of governance theatre: the bold declaration that appears to be action but is actually a way of avoiding action. The Union Cabinet on May 5 approved a Bill to increase the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38. The decision has been touted as a step toward judici

Wisdom stories that don’t preach but encourage reflection

The Foundation Of A Fulfilling Life: Lessons from Indian Scriptures Deepam Chatterjee Aleph Books, 264 pages, Rs 899  

Citizens of the Bay: Why BIMSTEC matters now

The international order is drifting into a dangerous grey zone as the very powers that built today`s multilateral system begin to chip away at it. The United States has increasingly walked away from global rules and forums when they no longer suit its interests, while China has rushed to fill the vacuum on

PM salutes armed forces on one year of Operation Sindoor

Prime minister Narendra Modi on Thursday saluted the courage, precision and resolve of the armed forces on the completion of one year of Operation Sindoor.   The PM said that the armed forces had given a fitting response to those who dared to attack innocent Indians at Pahalgam.&

Supreme Court judge strength to go up by four to 37

The strength of the Supreme Court is set to go up from 33 judges to 37 judges, paving the way for a more efficient and speedier justice. The Union Cabinet on Tuesday approved the proposal for introducing The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026 in Parliament to amend The Sup


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter