Forced philanthropy

Encouraging CSR is welcome, but mandating it will lead to avoidable complications

ashishm

Ashish Mehta | February 14, 2011



The corporate affairs ministry has initiated a healthy debate on corporate social responsibility that has thrown up several ideas. The latest among them is that companies with a turnover of Rs 1,000 crore or more (or net profit of Rs 5 crore or more) should set aside two percent of the net profit for CSR. The parliamentary standing committee on finance headed by former finance minister Yashwant Sinha has made this recommendation and the ministry has agreed to incorporate it in the companies bill, according to media reports.

India Inc. has, predictably, opposed the move. Many established industrial houses have been known for their exemplary charitable works. Of late, new economy players too have woken up to the charms of CSR for the right branding. It makes business sense to spend on causes like climate change for which a degree of awareness has built up. What the companies resent is being forced to spend a substantial amount on the kind of activities that the law will define as CSR.

While corporates, like everybody else, have responsibility towards society, they are after all in the business of business. If they do their business ethically and in a socially responsible manner, that should be sufficient. It would be better to have a non-polluting unit that does not spend on CSR rather than a highly polluting one that allocates a large sum of money to some NGO to plant trees in some faraway region.

If it is a question of generating resources for socially responsible initiatives, then taxes are supposed to be doing precisely that job. It would be better to let companies earn more and pay more taxes, which the state can put to the best use. The proposed scheme of things will only create a market for CSR work, in which players with varying degrees of credibility will provide services.

The two-percent proposal also invites comparisons with the Posco case. The environment ministry has asked the steel major to spend two percent of its profits on CSR to offset any adverse impact its plant may have in the region. This is quite common in the coal and mining sector. But generalising it for all companies across sectors would be tantamount to treating, say, Infosys as a Posco of sorts. That will be unfair. In any case, donation should not buy you atonement for your sins.

Comments

 

Other News

Former president Ram Nath Kovind on some of his unforgettable journeys

Triumph of the Indian Republic: My Life, My Struggles By Ram Nath Kovind Rupa Publications, 400 pages, Rs 795   All our presidents so far stand out, each for a different reason. Ram Nath Kovind, the 14th president of India, from 2017 t

Uday Kotak on history, Indian economy, growth and more

Pathbreakers: How 10 Visionary Leaders Transformed India by award-winning journalists  By Sucheta Dalal and Debashis Basu Rupa Publications, 304 pages, Rs 695  

₹5,000 crore saved from suspected financial fraud

In a significant gain for citizen protection in the digital economy, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has helped prevent suspected cyber fraud losses of more than ₹5,000 crore through its Financial Fraud Risk Indicator (FRI) within fifteen months of its launch on May 22, 2025. This money did

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter