Forced philanthropy

Encouraging CSR is welcome, but mandating it will lead to avoidable complications

ashishm

Ashish Mehta | February 14, 2011



The corporate affairs ministry has initiated a healthy debate on corporate social responsibility that has thrown up several ideas. The latest among them is that companies with a turnover of Rs 1,000 crore or more (or net profit of Rs 5 crore or more) should set aside two percent of the net profit for CSR. The parliamentary standing committee on finance headed by former finance minister Yashwant Sinha has made this recommendation and the ministry has agreed to incorporate it in the companies bill, according to media reports.

India Inc. has, predictably, opposed the move. Many established industrial houses have been known for their exemplary charitable works. Of late, new economy players too have woken up to the charms of CSR for the right branding. It makes business sense to spend on causes like climate change for which a degree of awareness has built up. What the companies resent is being forced to spend a substantial amount on the kind of activities that the law will define as CSR.

While corporates, like everybody else, have responsibility towards society, they are after all in the business of business. If they do their business ethically and in a socially responsible manner, that should be sufficient. It would be better to have a non-polluting unit that does not spend on CSR rather than a highly polluting one that allocates a large sum of money to some NGO to plant trees in some faraway region.

If it is a question of generating resources for socially responsible initiatives, then taxes are supposed to be doing precisely that job. It would be better to let companies earn more and pay more taxes, which the state can put to the best use. The proposed scheme of things will only create a market for CSR work, in which players with varying degrees of credibility will provide services.

The two-percent proposal also invites comparisons with the Posco case. The environment ministry has asked the steel major to spend two percent of its profits on CSR to offset any adverse impact its plant may have in the region. This is quite common in the coal and mining sector. But generalising it for all companies across sectors would be tantamount to treating, say, Infosys as a Posco of sorts. That will be unfair. In any case, donation should not buy you atonement for your sins.

Comments

 

Other News

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi

New pathways for tourism growth

Traditionally, India’s tourism policy has been based on three main components: the number of visitors, building tourist attractions and providing facilities for tourists. Due to the increase in climate-related issues and environmental destruction that occurred over previous years, policymakers have b

Is the US a superpower anymore?

On April 8, hours after warning that “a whole civilisation will die tonight,” US president Donald Trump, exhibiting his unique style of retreating from high-voltage brinkmanship, announced that he agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The weekend talks in Islamabad have failed and the futur


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter