Ineptitude and inaction mar governance

…forcing the court to get into the executive’s domain


Prasanna Mohanty | May 15, 2012

In the past couple of years we have often heard the government, ably led from the front by none other than prime minister Manmohan Singh himself, accusing the apex court of “judicial overreach”. More so after the court reversed certain policy decisions (the first-come-first-served policy for 2G spectrum allocation and appointment of PJ Thomas as CVC) and expressed anguish at certain others (continuation of A Raja in the cabinet after the 2G scam surfaced and that of Vilasrao Deshmukh after strictures were passed against him for protecting Vidarbha’s moneylenders).

The government said the court was transgressing the constitutional boundaries and entering the domain of the executive. There may be some truth to the charge but what does the court do when the government either makes decisions arbitrarily or makes none at all but looks helplessly at the court for direction? We have known cases of the former kind, the second week of May presented three instances of how it was virtually begging the court to make decisions on its behalf.

The first one relates to the Haj subsidy. Four years ago, a working group of Muslim MPs had recommended that it should be scrapped. The government seemed to agree and in 2010, newspapers reported that at least two ministries, of minority affairs and external affairs, had given their consent and the apex court, which was hearing a PIL, would soon be told about the decision to phase out the subsidy over the next seven years starting from 2011-12. But nothing happened. Finally, the apex court directed the government last week to phase out over the subsidy over next ten years. The court said the rising cost of the pilgrimage was not only draining the exchequer, the subsidy (about Rs 600 crore a year) could be better used to improve the lot of the community – by way of better education, health and other facilities.

Later in the same week the court had to deal with two similar cases in which the government didn’t know what to do. One related to a PIL seeking dismissal of former CJI KG Balakrishnan as chairman of the national human rights commission (NHRC) and inquiry into various allegations against him and his relatives. The apex court pointed out that the law that provided for the constitution of NHRC also provided for the removal of its chairman [clause 5(2) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993] and the government should just follow it – that is examine the charges and make a presidential reference to the apex court for his removal if it found the allegations true.

Similarly, faced with the strike by Air India pilots and in spite of a clear verdict from the Delhi high court that the strike was ‘illegal’, the government approached the apex court on May 10 asking it to begin contempt proceedings against the leaders of the agitating pilots. The court had to tell the government that the striking pilots had done “nothing for obstruction of justice or to bring disrepute to the court” to warrant such a proceeding. “Your problem is with them. You sit with them and sort out differences,” the court said and dismissed the government’s plea.

It is a pity that the government is unable to do what is obvious even to a layman but looks for the court’s direction. Allegations against KGB and the demand for scrapping the Haj subsidy are old ones. There is nothing new about the pampered pilots of Air India striking work on flimsy grounds either. Yet, when the court strikes down its arbitrary decisions it goes to town screaming violation of constitutional propriety and “judicial overreach”.



Other News

Making sense of facts – and alternative facts

The Art of Conjuring Alternate Realities: How Information Warfare Shapes Your World By Shivam Shankar Singh and Anand Venkatanarayanan HarperCollins / 284 pages / Rs 599 Professor Noam Chomsky, linguist and public intellectual, has often spoken of &ls

The Manali Trance: Economics of Abandoning Caution in the Time of Coronavirus

The brutal second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India has left a significant death toll in its wake. Health experts advise that the imminent third wave can be delayed by following simple measures like wearing a mask and engaging in social distancing. However, near the end of the second wave, we witnesse

Govt considers fixing driving hrs of commercial vehicles

Union Minister of Road Transport and Highways Nitin Gadkari has emphasised deciding driving hours for truck drivers of commercial vehicles, similar to pilots, to reduce fatigue-induced road accidents. In a Na

Telecom department simplifies KYC processes for mobile users

In a step towards Telecom Reforms which aim to provide internet and tele connectivity for the marginalised section, the Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of Communica

Mumbai think tank calls for climate action

Raising concerns over rising seawater levels and climate change, Mumbai First, a 25-year-old public-private partnership policy think tank, has written letters to Maharashtra chief minister Uddhav Thackeray, minister for environment and climate change, tourism and protocol, Aditya Thackeray and Mumbai munic

Creation of ‘good bank’ as important as ‘bad bank’ for NPA management

After the recent announcement of the government guarantee for Security Receipts (SRs) to be issued by a public sector-owned National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL), there is a surge of interest around this desi version of a super bad bank. The entity will acquire around ₹2 trillion bad debts fr

Visionary Talk: Gurcharan Das, Author, Commentator & Public Intellectual on key governance issues


Current Issue


Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter