Look who's talking

Pakistan does not sponsor terrorism. We have their word for it!

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | February 9, 2010



Ignore the self-congratulatory statements from Pakistan soon after India offered to resume bilateral talks suspended in the aftermath of the 26/11 massacre in Mumbai. Turn a blind eye to the anti-India terrorist organisations that openly paraded in Pakistan on the day India sent out the invite. Pay little heed to Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi who claim that international pressure and Pakistan's resolve forced India back to the negotiating table. Try as you might, though, you will find it difficult to fathom the strategic wisdom of our government to willy-nilly absolve Pakistan government of sponsoring terrorism against India.

“Hostile groups and elements operate from across the border to perpetrate terrorist acts in our country. The state of Jammu & Kashmir bears the brunt of the acts of these groups,” Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said in his address at the chief ministers' conference on internal security on Sunday. What the prime minister did not care to detail was his government's failure to bring perpetrators of the 26/11 massacre to justice because of systematic stonewalling by Pakistan government. Speaking as he did just days after his yet unexplained turnaround on the talks, the prime minister appeared to be making a clear distinction between Pakistan-based anti-India terrorist groups and the government across the border. Home Minister P Chidambaram referred to the terrorist groups as well and, much like the prime minister, took care to not blame the Pakistan government either.

Does it really serve India's strategic interest to absolve Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism? What do we hope to achieve by talking to a country that claims little responsibility over what happens within its own territory? Would Pakistan, or any other country for that matter, accept such a farce if positions were to be reversed?

Whatever the government's motivations or calculations, diplomacy cannot forever be treated as a substitute for self-interest.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter