Mamata’s smokescreen: a sham to undo Saradha's scam

Since all hearts are bleeding for the victims of Saradha’s big con, which they obviously should, why a tax hike only on cigarettes — why not a hike on, just randomly, rasgullas, shondesh, realty or sur-reality surrounding Bengal?

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | April 26, 2013



A smoker has two friends: a stick and a matchbox. And s/he as many foes: a nonsmoker and tax.


Lately, though, the foe count is increasing as both nonsmokers and taxes head north. Add to it a third foe, the opportunistic politician, and a smoker’s personal, Hamletesque tragic circle is complete.

A couple of couplets from a couple of politicians in the last couple of months:

“What does a finance minister turn to when he requires resources? The answer is cigarettes. I propose to increase the specific excise duty on cigarettes by about 18 percent.”

"To raise the fund (to bail out Saradha group victims), we will impose 10 percent tax on cigarettes.... Smoking more would not harm but would help in raising money for those who have been duped.”

For a smoker, this is as tragic as it gets, almost Marxist in scale. Remember the jazz about history repeating itself — the first time as tragedy and the second time around as farce? Looks like the ol’ chap really could have been talking about politics circa 2013.

The first time as a tragedy, eh P Chidambaram? And the second time as farce, right, Mamata Banerjee?

What Chidambaram did during his budget speech on February 28 this year was to spell out what was being done all the while but never acknowledged. And with it, he officially opened the doors for his compatriots in different states to pass on the onus of raising money for the governments’ coffers, most of which are drained by inefficiency and political handouts of the governments themselves.

Amit Mitra, the finance minister of West Bengal, a state not known to be averse to either inefficiency or political largesse, was prompt to take the cue, increasing the VAT on tobacco-related products from 20 percent to 25 percent while presenting his budget within a fortnight.

On April 24, his chief minister, Mamata Banerjee, showed she, too, had learnt her peculiar pecuniary lessons well. Announcing the 10-percent tax, she said this will “get us around Rs 150 core” of the Rs 500-crore payout package she had announced for the tens of thousands of poor investors who had bought into Sudipta Sen’s stink peddled in the name of get-rich-quick dream.

As a smoker, I obviously condemn Sen’s insanity and confidence to con the gullible — two attributes, as is emerging slowly, shared also by many several honchos in Banerjee’s own party — just as any of my fellow smoking and non-smoking brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece or friend would. What I also condemn is the fact that only I — along with my fellow smoking brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece or friend — am being asked to help repay those poor gullible souls.

My non-smoking brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces or friends would be able to get away by only shaking their heads in disbelief and condemning the toxic nexus between the conmen (and women) and the corrupt in the lead setup.

So, three quick questions for the CM...

1. Did the smokers have a hand in the Saradha group’s shams and scams?
2. Did the smokers light their first cigarette after signing an affidavit that they would bear all responsibilities of the society and help out the government at times of crises (manmade, mostly)?
3. Since all hearts are bleeding for the poor, which they obviously should, why not a 10-percent tax hike on, just randomly, rasgullas, shondesh, realty or sur-reality?

...And one guilty confession:

Thankfully, I don’t live in Bengal (and can thus shake my head in condemning Banerjee’s damning decision that will leave fellow smokers in the state a little more shaken).

Comments

 

Other News

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Nepal Floods: India keeps close watch on the situation

India`s central government has been keeping a close watch on the situation arising out of the flash flood in Nepal on Wednesday. Union home minister Amit Shah spoke with the chief ministers of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, the two states that share the border with Nepal, regarding the disaster

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter