My dime to your devastation

States offering sad amounts of money to help flood-ravaged Uttarakhand in its relief and rehab ops is strange

akash

Akash Deep Ashok | June 20, 2013



Let me give you a hypothetical situation to beat home my point. Your neighbour’s house is devastated by a natural calamity which spares yours. There is loss of life as well as property. Now, for some reason, you cannot help them physically but choose to provide them financial assistance. How much will you offer them? Of course, it will depend on what income bracket you belong to. In that case, what percentage of your monthly income? Ten, five, two, one, or point-five, point two five? Or even less, or even lesser, or minuscule, or even more negligible?

That’s the surprising trend coming out of the financial assistances being offered by different states to the flood-ravaged Uttarakhand.

In a country where states offer crores to medal-winning sportspersons (Olympic gold medallist shooter Abhinav Bindra got a total of Rs 3.5 crore from various states), states have put up the worst show of solidarity to the hill state which has lost hundreds of lives while close to a lakh are still stranded, not to count the immeasurable loss of property.

Uttar Pradesh, of which Uttarakhand used to be the power-generating greener part until only 13 years ago, has offered a shocking Rs 25 crore to the hill state. The state’s budget for 2013-14 was Rs 2,21,201.19 crore.

While Haryana, Delhi and Maharashtra have offered Rs 10 crore each to the state, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh have offered Rs 5 crore each.

Gujarat, whose chief minister’s development model is subject of political clamour in the country and management study in the universities abroad, has come up with a Rs 2-crore aid for the hill state. This much money does not buy a decent house even in a semi-tony colony in Ahmedabad.

While Karnataka has sent a three-member team to help rescue its own people stuck in the hills, Punjab has hired a private chopper to help its people stuck at Hemkunt Sahib.

The sad amounts of money being offered in the help point to a perceptible lack of empathy among the states. If this is how neighbouring states cohabit in our federal structure, then our housing societies are much better. At least we know how to help each other.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter