Thinking about thinking: How the mind (or AI) works -Governance Now

Thinking about thinking: How the mind (or AI) works

In ‘The Laws of Thought’, Tom Griffiths writes the exciting story of a quest that has given us thinking machines

GN Bureau | May 18, 2026

#Artificial Intelligence #Science #Mathematics

(Photo: Courtesy CrisNYCa via https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mus%C3%A9e_Rodin_1.jpg)

Tom Griffiths is one of those scientists working at the cutting edge of cognitive science and AI. He is a professor of psychology and computer science at Princeton University, and directs the Computational Cognitive Science Lab and the Princeton Laboratory for AI. His first book for general readership ‘Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions’ (co-authored with Brian Christian) applied computer science to daily life. His new work, ‘The Laws of Thought: The Quest for a Mathematical Theory of the Mind’ (HarperCollins) is a more ambitious, historical, and philosophical exploration. It shifts the focus from “how to act” to “how we work”. It presents a narrative history of cognitive science and a deep dive into the three competing frameworks that try to explain human intelligence.

Griffiths’ central question is, “Is there a ‘physics’ of the mind?’ We all understand the external world, with its “Laws of Nature”. Concepts such as gravity, force, entropy were formalized by scientists like Newton and Maxwell. But are there laws governing the internal world, that is, something like ‘Laws of Thought’? For 300 years, a quest has been going on to find a mathematical language for the mind, from Enlightenment philosophers to modern Large Language Models (LLMs). This book tells the story of that quest to formalize human thinking using mathematical frameworks. It is the story of how mathematics has been used to understand human cognition, from historical logic to modern AI systems.

The core of the book is organized around the three major mathematical frameworks that have attempted to "solve" the mind. Griffiths argues that the history of cognitive science is essentially a struggle between these three schools:

(1) Logic (Rules and Symbols): This was the first great hope. Starting with George Boole (who wrote the original The Laws of Thought in 1854), this school argues that thinking is like algebra. If you can define the rules (IF this, THEN that), you can simulate thought. Griffiths explores why this "Good Old Fashioned AI" (GOFAI) eventually hit a wall: the world is too messy for a finite list of rules.

(2) Neural Networks (The Connectionists): This school looks at the architecture of the brain rather than the rules of logic. It focuses on how simple units (neurons) connected in massive webs can "learn" patterns. Griffiths traces this from early "Perceptrons" to the modern "deep learning" revolution led by figures like Geoffrey Hinton.

(3) Probability and Statistics (The Bayesians): This is Griffiths’ own primary field of expertise. This framework suggests the mind is not a calculator or a simple web; it is a prediction engine. It uses "Bayesian inference" to update its beliefs about the world based on incomplete and noisy data.

A major theme of the book is why AI, despite its incredible power, still feels "different" from human thought.

Narrow vs. General: Griffiths points out that modern AI is often "super-specialized": it can beat a grandmaster at chess but can’t figure out how to fold a towel or navigate a social nuance.

The Data Gap: Humans learn from very little data (a child sees two cats and knows what a cat is). AI requires billions of parameters and massive datasets. Griffiths argues that the "Law of Thought" we haven't fully mastered yet is how humans use Prior Knowledge so efficiently.

Not a dry textbook, ‘The Laws of Thought’ uses the biographies of scientists to ground the math. We meet Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, the dreamer who wanted a "universal characteristic", a language where two philosophers in an argument could simply say, "Let us calculate!" to find the truth. Then there is George Boole, the schoolteacher who realized logic could be expressed as 0s and 1s, laying the foundation for the digital age. Then came the cognitive revolutionaries such as Alan Turing, Noam Chomsky, and Herbert Simon, who moved us away from Behaviourism (just looking at what people do) to Cognitivism (modeling what is happening inside the head).

Griffiths suggests that by trying to build ‘artificial’ intelligence, we have learned more about ‘natural’ intelligence. Every time a computer fails at a task that a toddler finds easy, it reveals a hidden ‘Law of Thought’ that we previously took for granted. He argues that we are currently in a ‘synthesis’ phase, where the most promising models of the mind combine symbols, neural networks, and probability.

In the final chapters, Griffiths moves into the ethical and social. As AI begins to make decisions about our lives, he argues that we must understand the mathematics of thought. If we don't know the "laws" the machine is following, we cannot hold it accountable, nor can we understand why it might develop biases that differ from our own.

Comments

Other News

“Cancer is just a mind game”

Dr. Ananda Shankar Jayant, a Padma Shri awardee, inspired audiences for decades through her mastery of Bharatanatyam and Kuchipudi. But it was her journey through cancer that taught some of life`s most powerful lessons in courage and resilience.

Why Swami Vivekananda is the pathfinder for our times

Swami Vivekananda for Our Times Edited and compiled by Rajiv Sikri, with Introduction by S. Gurumurthy Rupa Publications, 552 pages, Rs 695

Five ways to realise the potential of India’s handicraft and handloom sector

India`s economic ambitions are increasingly defined by the industries of the future. Semiconductors, electronics, artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing dominate policy conversations. Yet one of India`s largest employment-intensive sectors continues to occupy a surprisingly marginal place in ec

Beyond toilets: Why open defecation persists in rural India

Despite the awareness campaigns on sanitation across India, open defecation (OD) is practised openly and widely in both rural and urban areas. Research shows that rural respondents are well aware of the negative impacts of OD, yet this awareness does not lead to toilet construction or use. In rural North I

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake

What the US–Iran peace deal means for India

After months of rising tensions, the United States and Iran have reached a memorandum of understanding called the "Islamabad Agreement." This agreement allows for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and provides Iran with relief from sanctions, depending on its complianc