NCTC yes, but please think it through

Poorly designed NCTC will do little to fight terror

prasanna

Prasanna Mohanty | February 26, 2013



The Hyderabad blasts have revived the debate over national counter terrorism centre (NCTC), former union home minister P Chidambaram’s pet project to create an overarching organization to fight terrorism in the country, which was put on hold last year following widespread protests from the state governments. Chidambaram’s successor Sushil Kumar Shinde urged the state governments the next day through Rajya Sabha to agree to NCTC and offered a compromise, “if you wish we can take out the operations part (of the agency) and then take it forward”.

It is about time too. As per the home ministry’s original notification, NCTC would have come into existence from March 1, 2012. But no sooner did the notification, marked ‘top secret’, came nearly a dozen chief ministers raised a banner of revolt. They said they had not been consulted and that NCTC not only encroached on their domain it violated federal structure too. The notification was withdrawn and consultations began at two levels –chief ministers and chief secretaries and the director-generals of police. But these consultations made no headway.  Ever since Shinde took charge of the home ministry, in July 2012, nothing has been heard about it. Shinde has shown little inclination or aptitude. He has discontinued with the daily morning meeting with the chiefs of intelligence and security agencies that Chidambaram had started.

There is little to doubt that NCTC is needed. The Hyderabad blasts could not be prevented even though there were intelligence inputs, even if ‘vague’. A dedicated anti-terror body like NCTC is supposed to convert ‘vague’ to ‘actionable’ intelligence and follow it through. In absence of it this vague intelligence was forwarded to the state governments and then forgotten until the blasts happened.

But now is not the time to rush in, make conciliatory overtones to the states to make them happy and bring in NCTC. A poorly conceived NCTC would create, rather than solve any, problem.

It is time to initiate the debate over the architecture of powers of NCTC that never happened. Chidambaram devised his own plan and imposed it. The first mistake was not to consult the state government even though they are the essential stakeholders in any anti-terror architecture. Secondly, he went against his own good sense and instead of setting up an independent body made NCTC a part of the intelligence bureau (IB), which has dubious legal status and no accountability. Third, he gave them operational powers – power to search and arrest anyone anywhere in the country. Now can anything be more dangerous than a body with police powers (to search and arrest) but no clear legal existence or accountability?

The consultation process that had followed had agreed to take NCTC out of IB and devise a standard operating procedure (SOP) with the state governments to ensure perfect coordination among the various intelligence and security agencies. The SOP never got formulated.

Now Shinde is talking about divesting NCTC of the operational arm. Without that we are back to square one. NCTC gathers ‘vague’ intelligence and passes it on to the state governments and then, Hyderabad blasts happen again! NCTC may not necessarily have an operational arm. The US model from which NCTC has been copied doesn’t have one. The actual operations are carried out by their Homeland  Security and FBI. We can devise our own system which will work closely with NCTC.

As per the original vision of Chidambaram, NCTC was to have three arms – intelligence, investigation and operations. The national investigation agency (NIA) was to be the investigating arm of NCTC and came into being soon after 26/11. But who is probing the Hyderabad blasts? It is the Andhra Pradesh police. What is the point in having NIA? Again, this is happening because we react emotionally to terror incidents. We don’t think hard and devise a sound and workable architecture.

We need a mature and sensible response to the Hyderabad blasts. Shinde’s sudden interest in NCTC is actually counter-intuitive and may prove counter-productive.

Comments

 

Other News

India faces critical shortage of skin donors amid rising burn cases

India reports nearly 70 lakh burn injury cases every year, resulting in approximately 1.4 lakh deaths annually. Experts estimate that up to 50% of these lives could be saved with adequate access to skin donations.   A significant concern is that around 70% of burn victims fall wi

Not just politics, let`s discuss policies too

Why public policy matters Most days, India`s loudest debates stop at the ballot box. We can name every major leader and recall every campaign slogan. Still, far fewer of us can explain why a widow`s pension is delayed or how a government school`s budget is actually approved. That

When algorithms decide and children die

The images have not left me, of dead and wounded children being carried in the arms of the medics and relatives to the ambulances and hospitals. On February 28, at the start of Operation Epic Fury, cruise missiles struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh school – officially named a girls’ school, in Minab,

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter