Party is divided by factions owing allegiance to RSS-VHP combine
Ajay Singh | September 15, 2010
The BJP’s state of affairs is akin to a rudderless ship drifting aimlessly in a turbulent sea. While party stalwart L K Advani advises caution on the prospective Ayodhya verdict by the Allahabad high court, a section of the BJP leaders backed by the RSS-VHP has been aggressively strident.
Similarly, if a section of the moderate BJP leaders seems keen to keep the BJP-JD(U) alliance intact in Bihar, some leaders are hell-bent to break it by projecting Narendra Modi as the BJP’s face in the future campaign.
In fact, the party is divided by factions owing allegiance to the non-political mentors, the RSS-VHP combine. Apparently the new generation of the BJP leadership has bartered its political sense with expressed and supplicant loyalty to the RSS. This is the precise reason why the party is at a loss to formulate its response to the Ayodhya verdict scheduled to be delivered on September 24.
There is a firm belief in the RSS-VHP camp that an adverse verdict would mobilise Hindus no end. Votaries of such a belief feel that the moment could be conducive for a forceful resurrection of Hindutva in a style and elan of the nineties when the entire Hindi heartland was swamped by the colour saffron. That such a revival be monopolised only by the RSS-VHP and likeminded politicians is a strategy which is being worked out. This is why VHP chief Ashok Singhal is insistent that Advani be kept out of the strategy formulation. And this explains why Rajnath Singh is keen to make comments on the Ram Janambhoomi at the drop of a hat to endear himself to his mentors in the VHP and RSS.
However, pragmatists within the BJP do not share the party’s irrational optimism on Ayodhya. They feel that even an “adverse” Ayodhya verdict would end in a whimper. Only a section of the loony fringe would be fretting about it while the new generation would not be able to relate to the event that happened 18 years back. On the other hand, the verdict would be a good opportunity for the BJP to behave responsibly and shed off its image of a party clinging only to emotive religious issues. Advani’s caution explains this approach.
But there is little scope that voice of reason would prevail in the saffron camp. With Advani’s influence marginalised completely within the fold, the RSS has been dictating the new generation with its agenda. The Arun Jaitleys and Sushma Swarajs have no stature to stand down the RSS and take their independent views on the political issues. The Rajnath Singhs and Ananth Kumars are servile enough to be ready at their master’s beck and call.
In fact, much of the BJP’s conduct on the Ayodhya verdict would determine if Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar would continue his party’s alliance with the BJP. There is all possibility that one or two irresponsible statements from the BJP leadership can prove to be undoing of the coalition in Bihar. In such a scenario, the BJP would stand in splendid isolation in the company of Shiv Sena and Shibu Soren’s JMM in Jharkhand at the national stage.
With Lockdown 4 ending Sunday, the home ministry has issued new guidelines to fight COVID-19 and for phased re-opening of areas outside the Containment Zones. The guidelines, issued based on extensive consultations held with states and UTs, will be effective from June 1 till June 30. The first phase of reo
When the whole world is fighting COVID-19, food and nutrition security has become a major issue. The pandemic has aggravated the existing food crisis in India, especially in rural and tribal regions. There has been less availability of fresh foods in most parts of the country, and the tribal community has
India is determined to “set an example” for the rest of the word in the post-pandemic economic revival, prime minister Narendra Modi has said, underling the need to become self-reliant. “There is also a widespread debate on how the economies of various countries, including
Close to 48 lakh migrant labourers have been able to reach home from the cities they were working in, as the Indian Railways have run a total of 3,543 “Sharmik Special” trains from May 1. Following the home ministry order regarding the movement by special trains of migrant worker
Before the novel coronavirus hit it, Mumbai about 10-12 lakh labourers from elsewhere had made it their home. The figure for the state of Maharashtra was another 18-20 lakh. As the pandemic spread and the Maximum City emerged as the worst-hit place in India, all economic activities came to an end, and with
For the rest of the world, it is not easy to understand China when it comes to politics or economics. Under pressure from the international community, it has accepted to open the country for a “comprehensive” probe into the origin of the deadly coronavirus. But it is not clear whether the Asian