Salman’s advance tuition from supreme court

Supreme court rules no-entry to foreign law firms into India

manojkumarhs

Manoj Kumar | July 6, 2012



The supreme court has pulled the plug on any direct or indirect practice of law by foreign law firms in India vide in an order dated 4th July 2012. The apex court has directed that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) shall not grant any permission to foreign law firms to open any liaison offices in India.

The supreme court also clarified that the expression “to practise the profession of law” under the Advocates Act, 1961 covers both litigation as well as non-litigation practice. There even the practice of non-litigation matters by foreign law firms in India, by whatever name called, has to be in compliance with the provisions of Advocates Act, 1961.

It is pertinent to note that the Advocates Act, 1961 only allows persons licensed by the Bar Councils to practice the profession of law in India, which the foreign law firms are not able to comply with.

Law firms globally have been working overtime for almost a decade now to be able to practice law in India. Many of the United Kingdom’s major law firms have been pushing for access to practice law in India through the UK India Business Council (UKIBC), a body created in 2007 with a mandate to increase bilateral trade and investment between India and the UK.

What could be driving such a mad rush by foreign law firms to practise law in India?

As per some earlier reports, the aggregate revenues of domestic law firms is purportedly more than $350m (about Rs 1800 crore), with turnovers of individual law firms ranging between $500,000 (about Rs 3 crore) to $40m (about Rs 200 crore). Looking at the way forward, this is expected to be only the tip of the ice-berg.

Perceiving the possibility of the law profession in India being looked upon merely as a pot of gold and the possible consequential commercialisation of the law profession in India at the hands of foreign law firms, the Bar Council of India (BCI) has categorically opposed entry of foreign law firm repeatedly.

BCI has repeatedly reiterated that the Indian legal profession is both service-oriented as well as based on business principles and hence it was important to understand the legal profession in the Indian context.

The Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF) headed by senior lawyer Lalit Bhasin has continuously joined issues on the subject to oppose entry of foreign law firms into India unless a framework (i) addressing the concerns of Indian Law Firms and lawyers, and (ii) acceptable to the Indian legal fraternity is first put into place.

Interestingly, when law minister Salman Khurshid, a noted legal eagle himself, proposed to enact the Legal Practitioners (Regulation & Maintenance of Standards in Professions, Protecting the Interest of Clients and Promoting the Rule of Law) Bill, 2010, some time ago – it looked merely silly on his part to have lost sight of the essence & relevance of the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961 & the Bar Council of India.

Is the Bill intended to be a plan B for making way to foreign law firms to practice law in India in the midst of multiple judgments on the issue by Madras & Mumbai High Courts – by licensing them to practice law directly by the law ministry through the parallel body proposed to be created under the Bill.

The supreme court ruling bears me out on my own humble submission made on this website (read here) regarding the scope and ambit of the Advocates Act, 1961 and the consequential illegalities of the Bill.

Needless to say, the apex court’s ruling is a major setback to the foreign law firms already operating in India under the guise of liaison offices or similar set-ups.

The challenge now lies at the doorstep of the Government of India’s law ministry to implement the order of the supreme court in letter, spirit and intent and to take all actions necessary to prevent foreign law firms from practising law in India by any name or any other surrogate arrangements.

To start, Khurshid should take the order of the supreme court as an advance tutorial on the scope and ambit of the Advocates Act, 1961 and immediately withdraw the Bill which is fraught with illegalities apart from being contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.

Thereafter, the task is cut out for the law ministry with all Indian stakeholders like BCI, SILF and numerous law firms standing by its side to prevent entry of any foreign law firms in India.

Comments

 

Other News

Leadership skills you should hone/develop to grow in life

American author, speaker, and pastor John Calvin Maxwell once said, “A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way and shows the way. Leadership is a skill that some naturally possess, while some hone it over the course of their lives. When we think of leadership, our minds automatically drift to the s

India’s overall exports cross all-time high of $750 billion

India’s overall exports, including services and merchandise, have crossed US$750 billion, minister of commerce and industry Piyush Goyal has announced. This is an all-time high and this achievement comes in the 75th year of independence as we celebrate the Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav. Addr

Climate actions being implemented to deal with impact of heat waves

India’s climate actions cut across various sectors and are being implemented through various programs and schemes of different union ministries, departments and state/ union territory governments.  The government of India through concerned ministries and departments organises workshops, exhibiti

Banks must hear borrowers before declaring their accounts as frauds: SC

In a judgment with far-reaching implications, the Supreme Court has held that the civil consequences of an account being declared as fraud under the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directions, 2016 or its Master Directions on Fraud amount to ci

India’s forest cover increases by 5,516 sq km in four years

The Dehradun-based Forest Survey of India (FSI), an organization under the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, carries out the assessment of forest cover biennially since 1987 and the findings are published in the India State of Forest Report (ISFR). As per the latest ISFR 2021, there is a

Steps taken to meet higher power demand of April-May

While the average growth of energy requirement in the country for 2023-24 viz-a-viz 2022-23 has been estimated as 4.9%, the months of April and May have been projected as high demand period. During the current year, the peak demand is expected to be around 229 GW during the summer period. The government ha

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter