Such a sorry journey

Don’t you wish textbooks were merely of academic interest?

ashishm

Ashish Mehta | October 20, 2010



An acclaimed novel, taught at a university for several years, can be removed from the syllabus overnight because somebody’s son wants to make his political debut hitting the right note. The party in power, which claims to be somewhat more tolerant and inclusive than the opposition party of this father-son duo, rushes to justify this ban. Enthused by the camaraderie cutting across party lines, the book-ban party now also wants a burqa ban. All this is happening in a city that has reached where it has reached solely due to its openness to what the academics call The Other.

It is surely a sorry journey so far.

But let’s look at the brighter side of l’affaire Rohitnon Mistry:

That our universities and the whole higher education system are not as inflexible as we thought them to be. You thought a 154-year-old university would not bother to revise the syllabus and, see, they can make changes even midway through a semester. Let’s be content with that. It would be wishing too much that such changes were somewhat positive.

That our politicians do care for our education. You always thought they won’t have time to spare about matters of (here comes the nice phrase) mere academic interest, busy as they would be cutting deals with land mafias and party hoppers. How wrong we were! Of course, we wish etcetera etcetera.

That but for the bans and burnings, a majority would have forgotten what literature smells or tastes like. Except for Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses, Mistry’s Such a Long Journey and may be a bit of Taslima Nasrin’s Lajja, do we have public readings these days? There’s a ring of truth to what a character in Italo Calvino’s If on a Winter’s Night a Traveler says: nobody cares more for literature than dictators and fascists (the corollary being that those who should be caring for literature are caring more for positions on literary akademis).

That this highly productive debate over the Mistry book’s fate should now expand. They should propose a Right to be Offended and a National Policy on Ban (Books, Cinema, Statues and Other Cultural Products) along with a Commission on similar lines. There seems to be a political consensus in that direction.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Indian Ocean more contested than ever: Western Naval Command Chief

The Indian Ocean is becoming increasingly contested and strategically significant as the Indo-Pacific emerges as the defining geopolitical theatre of the 21st century, Vice Admiral Krishna Swaminathan, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command, has said.   Spe

Why the judiciary needs much more than four more judges

India has a particular form of governance theatre: the bold declaration that appears to be action but is actually a way of avoiding action. The Union Cabinet on May 5 approved a Bill to increase the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38. The decision has been touted as a step toward judici

Wisdom stories that don’t preach but encourage reflection

The Foundation Of A Fulfilling Life: Lessons from Indian Scriptures Deepam Chatterjee Aleph Books, 264 pages, Rs 899  

Citizens of the Bay: Why BIMSTEC matters now

The international order is drifting into a dangerous grey zone as the very powers that built today`s multilateral system begin to chip away at it. The United States has increasingly walked away from global rules and forums when they no longer suit its interests, while China has rushed to fill the vacuum on

PM salutes armed forces on one year of Operation Sindoor

Prime minister Narendra Modi on Thursday saluted the courage, precision and resolve of the armed forces on the completion of one year of Operation Sindoor.   The PM said that the armed forces had given a fitting response to those who dared to attack innocent Indians at Pahalgam.&

Supreme Court judge strength to go up by four to 37

The strength of the Supreme Court is set to go up from 33 judges to 37 judges, paving the way for a more efficient and speedier justice. The Union Cabinet on Tuesday approved the proposal for introducing The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026 in Parliament to amend The Sup


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter