New book puts together the late leader's selected writings of recent years
Arun Jaitley | March 12, 2020
A New India: Selected Writings 2014-19
By Arun Jaitley, with a foreword by Prime Minister Narendra Modi
Juggernaut Books, 384 pages, Rs 799
Arun Jaitley (28 December 1952 – 24 August 2019) was a senior advocate of the Supreme Court and one of the most important leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party. He was the union minister of finance from 2014 to 2019 and the leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha from 2009 to 2014. Jaitley held many senior positions in government in the past, including portfolios in finance, defence, commerce and industry. In later years he regularly commented on contemporary matters through his blog. Many of his small essays have been collected in a new book, 'A New India: Selected Writings 2014-19' (Juggernaut). Here is an excerpt from the book:
Forty-Two Years Ago: The Emergency
Posted on 1 July 2017
It has become customary for the critics of any government in India to casually use an expression ‘Undeclared Emergency’. Those making these exaggerated comments need to introspect their own roles during the Emergency. Most of them were either supporting the Emergency or were absent in any protest against the Emergency.
The Emergency was an assault on all democratic institutions. It not only established the dictatorship of an individual, it created an environment of tyranny and fear in society. Most institutions collapsed on their own. The Emergency was declared on the midnight of 25–26 June 1975. The ostensible and the official reason was a threat to public order but obviously this was a phoney reason. The real reason was that Mrs Indira Gandhi had been unseated in an election petition by the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court had granted only a conditional stay of the High Court order. She wanted to continue in power and resorted to imposition of the Emergency to enable this to happen. It would be in the fitness of things to remind those who loosely use a phrase ‘Undeclared Emergency’ with what happened during that period.
The first Act after the imposition of the Emergency was the detention of the political opposition under the preventive detention law. District magistrates and collectors were handed over blank detention forms to enable them to detain thousands of leaders and workers of the political opposition. Just the name, father’s name and address of each detainee was filled in hand. No grounds of detention existed in any case. Police stations were advised to register identical FIRs arresting ordinary political workers under the Defence of India rules after alleging that they were either members of banned organisation or were threatening to overthrow the government. Nine High Courts in the country held that the detention order was justiciable and in the absence of the grounds of detention the same could be quashed. The Supreme Court decided otherwise.
In preparation for the Emergency, the Supreme Court had already been packed with pliable judges. Three senior-most judges of the Supreme Court were superseded and those believing in the social philosophy of the government were in control of the court. The Supreme Court held that an illegally detained detainee had no judicial recourse during the Emergency. Justice H.R. Khanna was the only dissenting judge. Pre-censorship was imposed on the entire news media. Not a word could be published in the newspaper without going through the censor. An officer of the censor stayed in the premises of every major newspaper. The entire activities of the opposition were blacked out and the media contained only governmental propaganda. Many of those who now complain of an ‘Undeclared Emergency’ were either active or reluctant supporters of the Emergency regime.
Both the Constitution of India and the provisions of the Representation of the People Act were retrospectively amended so that each ground on which Mrs Indira Gandhi’s election had been set aside could be statutorily reversed. The pliable Supreme Court upheld the retrospective amendments to the provision of the Representation of the People Act by upholding the power of Parliament to amend any law retrospectively. The opposition members of both the Houses of Parliament stood detained. The numerical strength of Parliament was reduced. This gave the government an opportunity to amend the Constitution through a procured two-thirds majority in Parliament. A Parliament elected for a period of five years extended its own life beyond fi ve years by amending the Constitution.
Opposition governments in some states were dismissed and India witnessed virtually a single individual rule. All the ingredients of an absolute dictatorship existed. There was no personal liberty, no press freedom, Parliament became a farce, the highest court became subservient to the dictatorship and there was no room for dissent. This now was an ideal opportunity for the dictator to perpetuate her family and, therefore, the younger son of the prime minister, Mr Sanjay Gandhi, was proclaimed as the de facto successor. The country witnessed forced sterilisation, mass scale uprooting of the poor including the minorities from their homes, and misuse of the mass media.
An era of sycophancy always suffers from a dichotomy. A dictatorial regime is often misled by its own propaganda. It becomes a consumer of its own propaganda with nobody else believing it.
It misled itself to believe that the people were in support of the dictatorship. It, therefore, committed the ultimate error of ordering an election which witnessed a rebellion against the Emergency regime.
Today I wonder if those who routinely use the expression ‘Undeclared Emergency’ introspect and ask themselves a question ‘where was I during those nineteen months and what was my publicly declared stand at that time?’
The excerpt is reproduced with permission of the publisher.
India is a news-hungry nation with more than 1 lakh newspapers, apart from many news channels. News consumption is high – more so in smaller cities, and the industry needs to capitalize on its huge untapped potential, believes Ashish Bhasin, CEO, APAC, and chairman, India Dentsu Aegis Network.
As the Amnesty International downs the shutters on its India operations, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has taken suo motu cognizance of the matter and sought the home secretary’s response on the allegations levelled by the global organisation. Amnesty International in Ind
The Covid-19 pandemic has brought the spotlight on the health-promotive and disease-preventive solutions of Ayush (Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, Homeopathy) disciplines. What has not come into the limelight is the emerging nationwide trend in the Ayush disciplines, of taking up evidence-based studies.
The Indian electricity sector is going through an interesting phase right now. Many reforms are being introduced to increase competitiveness and transparency in the sector. The power market in India is a surplus market now and the spot prices are going down day by day. With all these indicators signaling a
The Indic Quotient: Reclaiming Heritage through Cultural Enterprise By Kaninika Mishra Bloomsbury India, 230 pages, Rs. 499 Over the past decade, India has seen a significant rise in passion for enterprise as well as pride in her
International observers will keenly watch the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee meeting next month. The central committee is the highest organ of the CCP with a mandate to execute the decision of the National Congress which is convened once every five years. Besides economy, r