What will Covid-19 promote on world stage: collaboration or competition?

In difficult times, globalization is junked and every nation is for itself first

Chenab | June 10, 2020


#Coronavirus   #Covid-19   #Globalisaiton   #Atmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan   #diplomacy   #economy  
WHO director general Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, whose organisation is facing pulls and pressures of the rift in globalisation (Photo courtesy: twitter.com/WHO)
WHO director general Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, whose organisation is facing pulls and pressures of the rift in globalisation (Photo courtesy: twitter.com/WHO)

 Coronavirus is the proverbial last nail in the coffin of globalization. Following this pandemic, we shall be constrained to live in a changed world. The claims of global solidarity and international cooperation have been decimated amidst this pandemic. This can be seen in the recent heightening of US-China tensions – a natural corollary of the Chinese origin of the virus and the America First policy of Donald Trump.

 
Throughout this pandemic, governments have hoarded medical equipment showing least concern for the inequalities that exist between nations in the world health order. (The fundamental truth here is that the virus can spread anywhere, shattering previous assumptions that transmission abates with increasing temperature and /or humidity). Barring a few notable exceptions, no government has lent a helping hand to African nations struggling with broken health systems and a dearth of qualified health workers. Even India, a country known for its magnanimity, has pledged only $10-million contribution to the SAARC Covid-19 Emergency Fund. The pandemic has shattered the few remnants of the superficial plaster of inter-governmental co-operation and laid bare the concrete truth: When a problem arises, every nation stands only for itself. 
 
Globalisation mustn’t simply be associated with cut-throat trade, for it is the heart of Internationalism: The principle of cooperation among nations for the promotion of their common good. For all that we have seen till now – from Trump’s ultimatum to the World Health Organization (WHO) to Bolsonaro’s criticism of Chinese investments in Brazil as a threat to national and economic sovereignty – it is merely a propaganda fest, the soul of which is intense nationalism. Despite openly undertaking jingoistic policies, the approval ratings of leaders around the world have shot up, attesting that the pro-nationalist stance of governments is ultimately backed by citizens at large. 
 
Locally speaking, even Indians have largely failed to notice the subtleties of the Aatmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan, which endeavours to promote and rejuvenate our local economy to create more employment. It openly promotes the idea of being “self-reliant” as a nation and not being dependent on other countries for investments and aid. We, as a nation, have accepted the ongoing trend of de-globalisation and are cognizant of the minimal collective solidarity among the States.
 
With the influence of the WHO at an all-time low since its inception, it is inevitable that the callousness of nationalist States shall further manifest itself openly in the form of a world-wide strife for preferential access to the vaccine whenever it is announced. The nation winning the Covid-19 vaccine race would certainly cater to its own citizens first. Then will come the turn of the richer nations, who will compete for priority access to any vaccine which makes its way to the market. The poorer nations would most probably be stuffed down and will only be able to get their share through aid organizations several months later. In the meantime, countless might die. Prospects of a neutral vaccine distribution system which takes into account the scale of outbreak in various nations, rather than catering to the nation-first agenda of influential superpowers are dimmer than ever.
 
I wish we could emerge through this dark tunnel with our humanity intact and embrace the warmth of sunlight through collaboration and mutual love. But the trends so far unnervingly portend otherwise. It seems obvious that nationalism would hardly subside and the inconceivable powers attained by the federal governments of most nations would not be relinquished readily once the pandemic is over. I hope I am proved wrong and our collective response is based on collaboration and not competition.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Not just politics, let`s discuss policies too

Why public policy matters Most days, India`s loudest debates stop at the ballot box. We can name every major leader and recall every campaign slogan. Still, far fewer of us can explain why a widow`s pension is delayed or how a government school`s budget is actually approved. That

When algorithms decide and children die

The images have not left me, of dead and wounded children being carried in the arms of the medics and relatives to the ambulances and hospitals. On February 28, at the start of Operation Epic Fury, cruise missiles struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh school – officially named a girls’ school, in Minab,

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter