Joshi bats for Sarpanchs

Rural Development Minister persists with in-house auditing of NREGS projects, keeps out NGOs

shivani

Shivani Chaturvedi | January 25, 2010




In an exclusive interview with Governance Now's Shivani Chaturvedi, Union Minister for Rural Development Dr C P Joshi talks about his efforts to make  the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) more effective. Strangely, he is persisting with a system that makes sarpanchs both the judge and the jury. The sarpanchs are the ones who get the NREGA projects executed in the first place and yet, they are the ones who alone can carry out social audit. Excerpts from the interview:

Q: What steps are being taken to improve rural economy so that migration from villages to cities stops?

Ans: The schemes are there to eliminate poverty. We have Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) which tries to bring the assisted poor families (swarozgaries) above the poverty line by ensuring appreciable sustained level of income over a period of time. Just a small part of the economy is dealt with by my department.

Q: Even the NREG scheme aims at reducing flow of people from rural to urban areas. How far has this been achieved?

Ans:Feedback is different from different states. Empirically, it has reduced migration as under the scheme people are getting work at their own place. But inference can best be drawn through scientific methods.
Delay in wage payment to beneficiaries is defeating the purpose of NREGS. Are there any plans to strengthen the payment system?
There will be business correspondents to pay wages under NREGS. The correspondents will work as bank agents and make payment on the basis of data recorded in specially designed machine that works on biometric technology. Entire details about the beneficiaries will be recorded in this handy machine. This initiative is expected to help improve wage payment system.

Q: NREGS is primarily a programme aimed at creating public assets that would be useful for the society at large. The principle was relaxed by allowing projects in private lands of selected marginalised communities including SCs and STs. Now this is being extended by permitting works in private lands owned by small and marginal farmers who are not SCs and STs. Why?

Ans:This provision was already there. Among the BPL families there are large numbers of marginal farmers. Because BPL selection was always questionable we have just put an umbrella under which all will be covered.

Q: NREGS paid rich dividend to the UPA in the last general election. Yet, there are restrictions on its social audit by independent agencies/NGOs and only gram sabhas are allowed to do it. Why so?
Ans: Social audit is to be conducted only by sarpanchas. There is no provision for NGOs to carry out social audit except in Andra Pradesh where they have directorate of social audit.

Q: Panchayati Raj institutions intend to play an important role in planning and executing NREGS. What is being done to ensure more flexibility at Panchayat level?

Ans:There is lack of capacity at the Panchayat level. They can identify the activities but cannot do the technical work. For that they can employ technical persons like junior engineers as per the provision in the Act. At some places this is being done.

Q: Is there any effective grievance redressal system for beneficiaries of NREGS?
Ans:
Yes, appointment of ombudsman has been done to redress grievances related to NREGS. This system has been introduced in 2009-10 and each state has been asked to do so. There are 619 districts where NREGS has been implemented. East district will have one ombudsman. There is a committee comprising state chief secretary, state rural development secretary, official nominated by the Government of India and civil society persons nominated by the government who will monitor the system. In addition to this, MPs have been asked to monitor rural development schemes in the districts. The state governments are required to have their own redressal system too. And the biggest tool is the Right to Information Act (RTI).

Q: Are there any plans to create projects exclusively for disabled?
Ans: In some states initiatives have been taken to bring such projects. We are asking other states to work in this direction.







 





 

 

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter