The latest edition of CHECKS AND BALANCES, an online discussion with experts on governance hosted by Sweta Ranjan, discusses how (ir)relevant is the colonial-era law now, 75 years after Independence
GN Bureau | May 20, 2022
Does the concept of sedition have a place in modern democracies? This question became more relevant when the apex court recently put the country's colonial-era sedition law on abeyance stating that there is a “requirement to balance… security interests and integrity of the State… and the civil liberties of citizens”. The top court put on hold trial in all sedition cases pending before courts across the country until the government completes its promised exercise “to re-examine and re-consider the provisions of section 124A of the Indian Penal Code".
The 152-year-old sedition law was first considered in Clause 113 of Thomas Babington Macaulay's Draft IPC in 1837 as S113 but it was not included in the final Act of 1860. It was added in 1870 after S124, as Section 124A. It was included by the British government as a tool to curb the voices of protest rising against the colonial administration.
Even Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana criticised the law in July 2021, saying “Sedition is a colonial law. It suppresses freedoms. It was used against Mahatma Gandhi, Tilak… Is this law necessary after 75 years of Independence?”
That is the question the latest edition of ‘Checks and Balances’, an online discussion with experts on governance challenges hosted by Sweta Ranjan, takes up. How (ir)relevant is the law of sedition in Indian democracy?
Watch the latest episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbbjJBrJWvswww.youtube.com/watch
Journalist Anil Chamadia, editor of the monthly journals ‘Mass Media’ and ‘Jan Media’, who is also a petitioner against the sedition law, says, “The government wants to suppress the feeling of citizenship among the people. They want to run a feudal system and treat people not like citizens but like subjects. I advocate that the law of land should prevail, fair investigation should be allowed space and criminals or guilty should be punished. I am against the law of sedition and have been urging the court to strike down the law as it is being misused. Ninety percent of people charged against TADA and POTA belonged to the Scheduled Tribes. Even now, most cases registered under 124A are against those who have been vocal against the looting tendency of the government, be it an activist, artist, journalist or a political worker.”
Vipul Mudgal, a journalist who is also director and chief executive of the NGO, ‘Common Cause’, finds this law strange. He, like Chamadia, denounces the 1962 Kedar Nath Singh ruling that upheld the constitutionality of the sedition law. Mudgal says, “I find the existence of such laws is a discrepancy and absurdity. All political parties have continued with this law. All parties are to be blamed for continuing with such draconian laws. All parties have double standards. When out of power they criticize but when in power they misuse it to the fullest.”
Giving instances of its misuse, he adds, “Tamil folk singer Kovan was arrested for writing and singing a song criticising Jayalalithaa's government liquor policy. He was put behind bars under the sedition law. A case of alleged sedition was registered against 49 celebrities, including Anurag Kashyap, Ramchandra Guha, Aparna Sen, Mani Ratnam and Adoor Gopalakrishnan, who had expressed concern in an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi over growing incidents of mob lynching.”
Senior journalist Prashant Tandon adds, “This has been misused by the governments against the public. This started within a few months of the formation of the Indian Constitution. This is a contradiction … The first amendment introduced in the USA provided people with the freedom of speech whereas India's first amendment in the Constitution imposed restrictions on the people. The first amendment gave birth to all draconian laws.”
Tandon adds, “In recent years, we have seen more than 100 percent jump in the number of sedition cases. This has been used against opposition politicians, students, journalists, authors, and academics. In the Balwant Singh vs State of Punjab case, 1995, the Supreme Court held that any slogan without evoking public response did not amount to sedition.”
Dr. Ajoy Kumar of the Indian National Congress says, “I agree that we made a mistake but it does not mean that others also should be allowed to do so... I personally feel that the Supreme Court’s decision to put the sedition law on hold is welcome. It sends a clear message to subjugators of dissent that the voice of truth will no longer be suppressed but there are many other existing laws like UAPA that may be misused to arrest anyone who is critical of the government.”
The gig economy has arrived in India, as the Covid-19 pandemic has propelled a flexibility of employment. As many as 77 lakh workers were engaged in the gig economy, constituting 2.6% of the non-agricultural workforce or 1.5% of the total workforce in India. The gig workforce is expected to expand to 2.35
From obtaining an electricity connection to a driver`s licence, ration card, or old-age allowance, delivery of government schemes and services is an aspect of governance that impacts citizens at various points throughout their lives. The Haryana state government provides over 600 such schemes and services.
From Dependence to Self-Reliance: Mapping India’s Rise as a Global Superpower By Bimal Jalan Rupa Publications, 184 pages, Rs 695 Bimal Jalan, a former governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), has been one of our finest commentators on econom
While many countries have been chasing to reach the carbon neutral status, only a few seem to be living up to their pledges as of now. The famous ’Paris Agreement’ of 2015 was glorified and celebrated that finally 196 countries have united with an intent to mitigate and reduce the greenhouse ga
The government this week announced the Tour of Duty or `Agnipath` scheme for the recruitment of soldiers in the armed forces. Under this scheme new soldiers will be recruited only for four years. This radical and far-reaching scheme has attracted mixed reactions from various quarters. While some officials
UPI has become an integral part of our daily lives now. We use it to buy groceries, we use it to send money to friends and family, we use it to purchase tickets, book shows, pay the cab driver, and a whole host of other things due to the ease and availability of such a platform at our fingertips. The best