• About Us
  • Feedback
  • Events Calendar
  • Archives
  • Newsletter
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Views
  • GovNow
  • GovNext
  • Login
  • Register
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Home › Views › Columns › In the court of justice Katju

In the court of justice Katju

Statutes & statues: A trial on the reading table
Akash Deep Ashok | January 12 2012

Author Profile

akash's picture
Akash Deep Ashok
Akash Deep is a senior editor at Governance Now.

Share

Case: A newspaper reader’s plaint — early morning confusion.
Court: Of justice Katju, the press council of India chief.
Complainant: The argumentative Indian.
 
Your Honour,

I’ll begin with a word of praise for the chair. I have become a sincere newspaper reader ever since you took over as the PCI chief. I admit I was a flippant reader earlier and rooted for the demise of likes of Dev Anand to be on page 1. You beat better sense in me and now I value our farmers more. Also, after the Indian cricket squad’s knuckle-hurting crawl Down Under and MCD’s straight ‘no’ to naming a Chandni Chowk road after Sachin Tendulkar, Bharat Ratna, as my lord so emphatically said earlier, seems a far cry.


Moving on to the plaint, your honour, I am not too happy with what I read in the newspapers these days. It is a confusing start of the day. The law minister of the country is issued a notice by the election commission for violating model code of conduct. Now, the law minister not knowing, or following, law is too bad, isn’t it? But pat comes the law minister’s reply — “the manner in which notice is being issued indicates that the election commission lacks basic fundamentals about the polls”. The poll panel not knowing fundamentals about polls is too bad also. What of the two is worse, my lord? I can’t figure out.

Then, there is this statue cover-up thing going on in UP. What’s this? The law minister has also termed the EC’s order of covering the statues of BSP symbol and its supremo as “wrong”. But compliance on the part of the UP chief minister impressed me a lot. The day the order was issued, she was bang on the job. Miles of blue tarpaulin was bought and the jumbo cover-up work got under way. Then the EC objected to the colour blue. The CM followed the directive immediately and changed the colour to ‘pink or yellow’ as directed. What if the statues, gosh so many of them are there, were tied a little too tight so as to keep the shape of the covered elephants obviously intact? The trunk remained the trunk and ears ears. The CM has surely an eye for finery and detail. Who do you blame, your honour, for the tomfoolery — the CM or the EC?

I ask you because you take sides, and defend, and pan, and enlighten us. The other day, you so chivalrously came to the rescue of Sunny Leone. Mary Magdalene and Amrapali and all that stuff. I read that. That was impressive. Secretly, I too like Leone very much, like the millions of countrymen who made her the most googled person (of India) recently. But I couldn’t package my clandestine liking so smartly as you did. Very clever of you!

In the end, I implore my lord to delve on the points I have raised: who of the EC, the law minister and the UP CM is right, more right, wrong or more wrong?            

(The proceeding verbatim, as imagined on the reading table.)

Related stories

Stories you might like

No strain in Cong-Trinamool ties: Bansal
Maya statues: supplier alleges dues not paid
Separate planning board for Muslims suggested
Swarup to join MHA as addl secy
Haj subsidy and policy vacuum

More stories in this section

At home in politics: dilemma of a disgraced bureaucrat
A thin line between governance and control
Taking cue from Okhil Babu's lota travails
Comments posted as an unregistered user will need to be approved by an editor. If you would like to post comments without delay, please register / login.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Input format
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.

In This Section

  • Most Emailed
  • Most Popular
  • Most Commented
  • I just want to be a change agent - Nilekani...
  • e-Gov lessons from Estonia!...
  • Gandhi in Egypt...
  • Shouldn't the PM come within the ambit of Lok...
2G anna hazare Bihar BJP CBI china congress corruption Delhi DoT e-governance facebook Gujarat High Court India jairam ramesh Kapil Sibal Karnataka Maharashtra Manmohan Singh Mumbai parliament P Chidambaram Pranab Mukherjee prime minister rajya sabha RTI supreme court US Uttar Pradesh
more tags
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Copyright ©2010 Governance Now
  • Copyright Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • Advertise with us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Developed by LDI