Are corporate interests more important than citizens' welfare for our governments?

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | June 10, 2010



Close on the heels of the tragic Bhopal gas leak verdict has come the revelation that the Centre dropped a key clause in the Nuclear Liability Bill to benefit suppliers who could have been held accountable for wilful negligence. The move reportedly came after American suppliers mounted pressure to get deleted section 17 (b) which said that suppliers could be sued for a nuclear accident resulting from wilful act or gross negligence on their part.

Amidst a raging debate over the woefully inadequate compensation to victims and sentence to perpetrators of the Bhopal tragedy, the Centre's move appears to be yet another case of our governments batting for corporates even at the cost of national interest. The furore over capping the liability at Rs 500 crore clearly did not deter the government from tinkering with the controversial Bill further.

If Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has much to explain about going out of his way to guard interests of American suppliers, so does Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit about backing the power distribution companies that have been found guilty of fudging information about their financial health. Even as Delhi's power regulator has found that the three power distribution companies clocked a profit of around Rs 1,000 crore last fiscal, the chief minister continues to plead for slapping a hike in tariff on the hapless consumers. Only now she is arguing for an uninterrupted power supply instead of her earlier stance of helping the distribution companies bridge their losses.

The larger question, therefore, arises whether corporate interests are more important than citizens' welfare for our governments.

 

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter