Shouldn’t the PMO let Jairam mind his ministry?

GN Bureau | June 1, 2010



Isn’t the environment ministry competent to decide which green areas need to be conserved and where mining can be allowed? Isn’t it the environment minister’s business to decide whether any proposed economic activity can prove detrimental to the country’s environmental interests? The intervention of the prime minister’s office in the ongoing tussle between the environment ministry and the coal ministry suggests that the prime minister thinks otherwise.

In the latest spat between the environment ministry and a pro-industrialisation lobby, in this case the coal ministry, the latter has asked for an increase in the area where mining can be allowed. While the coal ministry has demanded an increase of 30 percent, the environment ministry is prepared to concede only five percent, according to a report in The Hindustan Times (first reported by The Indian Express). Even this concession would mean a loss of some area under dense forests that the environment ministry had declared as ‘no go’ areas for mining. According to the daily, at least 48 percent of mining areas fall under the ‘no go’ zone. The PMO, however, intervened on behalf of the coal ministry and said the environment ministry’s definition of ‘no go’ areas wasn’t acceptable.

The question, therefore, arises whether the PMO shouldn’t let environment minister Jairam Ramesh mind at least his business.
 

Comments

 

Other News

What is colonialism? A relook at modern history

The Chromatic World Order: The Fiction That Rules Our World  By Sajid Mohamed Aakar Books  

Monsoon session of parliament adjourns sine die

The Monsoon Session, 2026 of Parliament which commenced on July 20 was adjourned sine die on Thursday. The session provided 19 sittings spread over a period of 25 days.   During the session 11 Bills were introduced in Lok Sabha and 2 Bills were introduced in Rajya Sabha. 12 B

Consumer Justice at a Crossroads

Over the past four decades, India`s consumer protection landscape has undergone a remarkable transformation. What began with the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as a simple mechanism to empower ordinary citizens has evolved into a comprehensive framework capable of addressing challenges ranging from mislea

Doctors, experts call for ban on junk food ads, mandate warning labels

More than 30 doctors, medical scientists and public health professionals have urged the government to take decisive action against the aggressive advertising and marketing of junk food, calling for a watershed ban on advertisements for foods high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) and ultra-processed foods (UPF

Asiatic Lion population rises from 523 in 2015 to 891 in 2025

On World Lion Day 2026, environment, forest and climate change Minister  Bhupender Yadav celebrated India’s remarkable journey in lion conservation and reaffirmed the country’s unwavering commitment to protecting wildlife and biodiversity.   In a post on soc

Railways imposed ₹5.13 crore fine for food quality and hygiene violations

Indian Railways serve about 58 crore meals every year on an average. About only 0.0008% food quality related complaints are received on average. Based on complaints during the last three years, appropriate penal actions have been taken by IRCTC. Such actions include imposition of fines amounting to ₹5.13

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter