Shouldn’t the PMO let Jairam mind his ministry?

GN Bureau | June 1, 2010



Isn’t the environment ministry competent to decide which green areas need to be conserved and where mining can be allowed? Isn’t it the environment minister’s business to decide whether any proposed economic activity can prove detrimental to the country’s environmental interests? The intervention of the prime minister’s office in the ongoing tussle between the environment ministry and the coal ministry suggests that the prime minister thinks otherwise.

In the latest spat between the environment ministry and a pro-industrialisation lobby, in this case the coal ministry, the latter has asked for an increase in the area where mining can be allowed. While the coal ministry has demanded an increase of 30 percent, the environment ministry is prepared to concede only five percent, according to a report in The Hindustan Times (first reported by The Indian Express). Even this concession would mean a loss of some area under dense forests that the environment ministry had declared as ‘no go’ areas for mining. According to the daily, at least 48 percent of mining areas fall under the ‘no go’ zone. The PMO, however, intervened on behalf of the coal ministry and said the environment ministry’s definition of ‘no go’ areas wasn’t acceptable.

The question, therefore, arises whether the PMO shouldn’t let environment minister Jairam Ramesh mind at least his business.
 

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter