Shouldn't BCCI be nationalized?

GN Bureau | April 22, 2010



The BCCI is a society registered in 1928 under an obscure Tamil Nadu Society Registration Act of 1860 and still retains its colonial –era constitution which makes it a closely-held private club. Paradoxically, it runs the most popular sport and represents the country at international events. As a private body, it keeps its functioning and its balance sheet under wrap but as a public body it organizes cricket matches at state-built stadiums and gets security cover free of cost. It has enjoyed tax exemption saying that promoting cricket is a charitable work but it makes tons of money by selling telecast rights, advertisement space in stadiums and now, auctioning IPL teams for obscene sums. BCCI’s income for 2006-7, that is before IPL was launched, stood at Rs 247.86 crore but not a pie has been paid as tax.


As the IPL scam now reveals, big money has brought more opaqueness to BCCI’s functioning. No less than BCCI president Shashank Manohar says he has no idea who the real owners of various IPL franchises are. Much less is known about the source of money that has been put in to run these franchises. One of the BCCI board member and governing council member of IPL, N Srinivasan, actually runs a franchise but Manohar says there is no conflict of interest! BCCI’s “national selector” K Srikanth acts as an appendage of one particular IPL franchise but nobody even questions him.

Is this the way we want cricket to be run in this country? Should we leave administration of the game we are most passionate about to a private club run by a few individuals who are more passionate about their sweetheart deals? Shouldn’t we nationalize the body governing our most popular sport so that there is more accountability and more transparency in the way its functions and people have their more say?

 

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter