Telecos seek stay on audit by CAG

SC to hear plea in August

PTI | June 9, 2010



The Supreme Court today did not give a stay to mobile operators on a Delhi High Court order enabling an audit by Comptroller and Auditor General to ascertain whether there were revenue leakages in licence fee payment to the government.

A vacation bench, comprising Justice Deepak Verma and Justice K S Radhakrishnan, adjourned the hearing in the case to August.

During the proceedings, the counsel appearing for the apex body--Cellular Operator's Association of India (COAI)-- contended that the High Court's direction was not based on merit.

Over CAG's authority to inspect their account books, the bench observed, "That is the statutory requirement of law...

You (telcos) would have to cooperate."

COAI counsel also submitted that the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) had no powers to audit their books under article 149 of the constitution.

Responding to the contention, the bench said, "They (high court) have only asked you to give revenue share details."

COAI had appealed against the order by a division bench of the Delhi High court on June 1, directing mobile operators to submit their account books to CAG.

However, the bench had said that CAG would not demand any additional document except the revenue sharing details and would not disclose the information in the public domain or to any third-party.

In their petition before the apex court, COAI has submitted that the high court "failed to appreciate that CAG has no jurisdiction or power to conduct an audit over the petitioners, which are private companies."

They also requested that apex court pass a direction to the government and CAG "from invoking or taking any coercive action against them" under the Rule 5 of the TRAI Service Provider (Maintenance of Books of Accounts) Rules, 2002.

COAI, in its petition also requested the apex court to strike down the rules contending that the DoT cannot extend the power of CAG, which is governed by an act of Parliament.

"Rule 5... cannot extend the powers of CAG to cover matters not covered under the C&AG Act and is liable to be struck down as ultra vires.

Earlier, on May 20, telecom tribunal TDSAT had also declined a similar request from Bharti Airtel and Vodafone to stay the CAG audit.

 

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter