CAG spots irregularities in Gujarat PSUs

Some of the DISCOMS placed purchase orders in excess of their limit

GN Bureau | April 21, 2017


#CAG report   #Gujarat PSUs   #state public sector undertakings  


 
 
The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has found shortcomings in Gujarat PSUs, particularly in seven companies that came into being after the Gujarat Electricity Board (GEB) was unbundled in 2005.
 
The CAG report said that the state public sector undertakings (SPSUs) consist of state government companies and statutory corporations. The SPSUs are established to carry out the activities of commercial nature keeping in view the welfare of people and also occupy an important place in the state economy.
 
As on March 31, 2016, in Gujarat there were 72 working SPSUs (68 companies and four statutory corporations) and 14 non-working SPSUs. The working SPSUs registered a turnover of Rs 1,11,036.50 crore as per their latest accounts. The turnover was equal to 11.27 percent of state’s gross domestic product for 2015-16.
 
The investment (capital and long term loans) in 86 SPSUs was Rs 1,29,178.86 crore. Out of the total investment, 99.38 percent (Rs 1,28,378.33 crore) was in working SPSUs and remaining 0.62 per cent (Rs 800.53 crore) was in non-working SPSUs.
 
Thirty six working SPSUs had arrears of 64 accounts as on September 30, 2016. The extent of arrears ranged from one to six years.
 
During the year 2015-16, as per their latest accounts, out of 72 working SPSUs, 49 SPSUs earned profit of Rs  2,854.27 crore and 14 SPSUs incurred loss of Rs 1,221.15 crore. The major contributors to the profit were Gujarat State Petronet Limited (Rs 667.86 crore), Gujarat Gas Limited (Rs 252.25 crore), Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited (Rs 336.63 crore) and Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Limited (Rs 302.79 crore).
 
Major loss making SPSUs were Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Limited (Rs 875.00 crore), Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (Rs 132.45 crore), Gujarat State Financial Corporation (Rs 104.99 crore) and Gujarat Water Infrastructure Limited (Rs 91.37 crore).
 
The CAG report went on to say that the Gujarat Electricity Board (GEB) was unbundled with effect from April 1, 2005 into seven separate companies. They had functional responsibility for generation, transmission, distribution and trading of electricity. The distribution of electricity was vested with four Power Distribution Companies (DISCOMs).
 
The DISCOMs were Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited (DGVCL), Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limited (MGVCL), Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Limited (UGVCL) and Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited (PGVCL). They catered to the consumers in south Gujarat, central Gujarat, north Gujarat and Saurashtra region respectively.
The creation and maintenance of the distribution network requires purchases of different kind of materials and their storage at convenient locations.
 
The DISCOMs after unbundling continued to follow the Purchase Policy 2000 of the erstwhile GEB. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL - holding Company) circulated purchase guidelines to all its subsidiary companies. We found that the above purchase policies had not been uniformly adopted by all the DISCOMs.
 
MGVCL, PGVCL and UGVCL placed Purchase Orders (POs) on new parties in excess of individual limits prescribed in the purchase policies.
 
MGVCL, in violation of the Purchase Policy 2000, allotted quantity above the 10 percent limit to new bidders in two tenders amounting to Rs 13.65 crore. PGVCL in respect of ten tenders and UGVCL in respect of one tender allotted excess quantity to new bidders to the extent of Rs 28.95 crore and Rs 4.05 crore respectively.
 
MGVCL and UGVCL awarded POs worth Rs 4.93 crore to new bidders though their rates were not lower than the lowest regular bidder. As per Purchase Policy 2000 and 2011 these bidders were not eligible for any allocation.
 
In accordance with the Purchase Policy 2011, 50 percent of tendered quantity was to be allotted to Gujarat based firms. The final cost of the product quoted by the Gujarat based firms could not be more than 15 percent of the cost quoted by the firms from outside Gujarat. PGVCL awarded a PO worth Rs 3.62 crore to a Gujarat based firm in violation of this requirement.
 
Read: CAG report on Gujarat PSUs 
 

Comments

 

Other News

On a personal note: DIVINE

An underground rapper who grew up on Mumbai streets, Divine spins his music around his environment and poverty. His breakout single, ‘Meri Gully Mein’, along with fellow rapper Naezy caught Bollywood’s attention. The Hindi film ‘Gully Boy’ is inspired by their lives and gr

The role model for an IAS officer

Anil Swarup, an IAS officer of Uttar Pradesh cadre who retired in 2018, is a model bureaucrat who retained his optimism right till the end of service and exemplified dedication and commitment. His excitement at the opportunities that a job in the IAS provided is evident on every page of his new book publis

Reform of the civil services: At home and away

The question of reform of the civil services has been debated extensively at all levels at least over the last five to six decades after independence. Indeed, it was soon perceived that the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) may not be well equipped to deal with the problems of an emerging developing coun

The greatest challenge for any government

Shouting vengeance at all and sundry while wriggling out of holes of our own making seems to be our very special national characteristic. Some recent instances are illustrative of this attribute. A number of business tycoons with thousands of crores of unresolved debts have fled abroad with the government

The mysterious case of CBI’s legality

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) came into existence, based on a Resolution of the home ministry, dated April 1, 1963 – a sheer coincidence that it also happens to be April Fool’s day. Over the past few months, we have seen the CBI live up to its founding day with great zeal, being i

The Evolution of Modi

Gujarat was passing through a turbulent phase in the 1980s. The decade began middle class agitations against new reservation policies, and the caste friction turned communal under the watch of chief minister Madhavsinh Solanki, alienating majority of urban population on both counts. The ground was ripe for

Current Issue

Current Issue

Video

CM Nitish’s convoy attacked in Buxar

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter