Lateral entry into civil service is again back on the table

The government is again looking at allowing lateral entry into the civil service. This had been recommended by the Administrative Reforms Commission

rahul

Rahul Dass | July 14, 2017 | New Delhi


#lateral entry   #civil services   #PMO  
(Illustration: Ashish Asthana)
(Illustration: Ashish Asthana)

Lateral entry into the civil service is again being considered to meet the shortage of officers in the middle management level. This is a U-turn from last year, when the government had ruled it out.
 
Instructions have come from the prime minister’s office to prepare a broad outline of modalities for selecting private individuals for appointment in the ranks of deputy secretary, director and joint secretary. The move was in response to a central government staffing policy paper where the DoPT had indicated a huge shortage of officers in the middle management level, reported the Indian Express citing sources. 
 
The preliminary estimate was that around 40 individuals, including successful entrepreneurs, academicians and social workers, would be taken in through lateral entry, mainly at the joint secretary level where there is a dearth of officers.
 
This is an unexpected turn around for the government which a little less than a year back had made it clear that there will be no lateral entry into the civil service.
 
Jitendra Singh, minister of state in the ministry of personnel, public grievances and pensions and minister of state in the prime minister’s office, informed the Lok Sabha on August 10, 2016: “At present there is no proposal to constitute a Committee to study the feasibility of lateral entry into the civil services.”
 
“As regards, the administrative reforms in Civil Services, the Central Government sets up Administrative Reforms Commissions (ARC) from time to time which make recommendations. The Pay Commission set up by the Central Government also give recommendations on reform measures. It is the constant endeavour of the Government to improve its efficiency and public perception through a series of measures including administrative reforms,” said Singh. 
 
Bureaucracy in India has received constant criticism for its inefficiency, so much so that of the 12 Asian countries covered in the study by Political & Economic Risk Consultancy Ltd., India was found to have the worst bureaucracy. 
 
The report blamed India’s poor infrastructure, widespread corruption and “fickle” regulations for making business a “frustrating and expensive” affair.
 
Bureaucrats are seldom challenged or held accountable, giving them “terrific powers,” the report said. It added that this “could be one of the main reasons why average Indians as well as existing and would-be foreign investors perceive India’s bureaucrats as negatively as they do”, it said.
 
In light of this perception it is all the more important to improve the efficiency in bureaucracy. A good way out would be to have lateral entry of experts.
 
The 10th report of the Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC)  said that it “feels that lateral entry as done in the past on an ad hoc basis can hardly be considered a suitable model of manpower planning since the present incumbents in government departments tend to resist entry of outside talent and the whole process remains personality driven and inchoate. There is therefore a need to institutionalise the process of induction of outside talent into the government.”
 
The commission noted that government of India has, in the past, also inducted outside talent from time to time into the higher tiers of government usually in advisory positions but occasionally even in key administrative assignments. For example the Chief Economic Advisor, Government of India is traditionally a lateral entrant who, as per rules, should be below 45 years of age and is invariably an eminent economist. A number of other outstanding persons have been inducted at the highest level as secretaries to government.
There is, however, criticism over allowing lateral entry.
 
Vivek Rae, a former petroleum secretary and member of the Seventh Central Pay Commission, wrote in the Business Standard: “While there are many shortcomings in the civil services in India, the suggestion for large-scale lateral entry into top policymaking positions is ill-considered and half-baked. Lateral entry would open the flood gates for a spoils system, drive talented people away from a civil service career, would be inequitable in terms of sharing the burdens and benefits of public service, would widen the disconnect between policymaking and implementation, and would not by itself result in improved managerial performance or enhanced accountability. Lateral entry has been an exception in the Indian civil service system and should continue to be so.”
 
He said that the proposal for lateral entry at senior decision-making levels, besides increasing the disconnect between policymaking and implementation, will also result in inequitable sharing of the benefits and burdens of government service, with permanent civil servants left to bear the burden of "humble" implementation and lateral entrants getting access to "glamorous" policymaking positions, without having roughed it out in remote and rural India in the rough and tumble of Indian democracy.
 
“While there may be exceptions, the experience of inducting private-sector managers to run public-sector enterprises is not particularly satisfactory. Whiz-kids from the private sector who ran Air India, Indian Airlines and Vayudoot proved to be failures,” he added.
 

Comments

 

Other News

As nation lighted lamps, power grid delivered

As Indians switched off lights in homes and lighted lamps and candles Sunday night following prime minister Narendra Modi’s appeal as a gesture of solidarity in the fight against COVID-19, the power grid held up well despite the sudden drop in demand. In a short video message on Friday

3 out of 4 Covid-19 patients in 21-60 yrs age group

Contrary to the perception that the elderly are more at risk from Covid-19, in India as many as 41.88% of corona positive cases are between 21 to 40 years of age. Also, 32.82% positive cases are between 41 to 60 years, followed by 16.69% cases above the age of 60 years and 8.61% coronavirus positive cases

Why everyone should wear mask

In view of the increasing number of COVID -19 cases in the country, the ministry of health and family welfare (MoHFW) has now advised that everyone must voluntarily wear a mask and especially those living in densely populated areas.   Not just as a matter of maintaining personal hygiene

Fighting Covid-19, India has realized its collective strength: PM

In the face of the Covid-19 pandemic, people of India have realized their collective strength, prime minister Narendra Modi said in a short video message Friday morning. He also urged people to light lamps Sunday night as a gesture of this collectivity. “Today marks nine days of the na

COVID-19 demobilisation: Lessons for public governance

Demobilization, like its predecessor – demonetization, is another decision gone bad in implementation.  In both instances a careful public administrative action through its governance systems could have saved the magnitude of impact particularly on the most vulnerable sections of the society. Th

Don’t fear Corona, fight it

In a bid to break the “chain of transmission” of the deadly Covid-19, India, a country with more than 1.3 billion population, observed a voluntary ‘Janata Curfew’ on March 22. This has been followed by a 21-day, nationwide lockdown from March 24. Prime minister Narendra Modi also re



Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter