AIIMS doc 'uses' Sunanda death case for internal wrangling

Head of forensic dept files affidavit with CAT, alleges “pressure” to give wrong report in Tharoor wife’s mystery death

pankaj

Pankaj Kumar | June 30, 2014 | New Delhi




The controversy over Sunanda Pushkar’s mysterious death is being stoked to settle scores in the ongoing internal bickering and promotional wrangling among faculty members of the All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS).

The autopsy report of Pushkar, wife of former HRD minister and Congress leader Shashi Tharoor, pointed overdose of a sedative drug known as “alprax” as the probable cause of death. However Dr Sudhir Gupta, head of the panel that conducted post-mortem, has filed an affidavit in the central administrative tribunal (CAT) and made a startling revelation about how he was goaded by higher authorities to give a tailor-made report.

Dr Gupta, in his affidavit dated June 26, has accused both the health ministry and then president of AIIMS, former health minister Ghulam Nabi Azad, of pressuring him to act in an “unprofessional” manner to hush up the matter. Though the affidavit did not elaborate on the nature of pressure, it states that given the influence of two ministers – Azad and Tharoor – in the case, Dr Gupta could not come out with this truth.

His affidavit says, “(The) applicant could not muster courage of openly placing the facts in black and white as the former President of AIIMS Shri Gulam Nabi Azad was an immensely powerful politician and then the Health Minister and the Husband of late Sunanda Pushkar was also a minister and a powerful politician.”

In what appears to be an attempt at further sensationalisation of the high-profile case, Dr Gupta has sought CAT’s permission to give his opinion on the case in a “sealed envelop”.

Curiously enough, Dr Gupta has referred to this disclosure to bolster the case for his continuation as head of the forensic department in the prestigious AIIMS. Of late he has been slapped with charges of plagiarism and misconduct which he has been contesting in the CAT. In his affidavit filed on Monday (June 30) morning, Dr Gupta expressed apprehension about his victimisation on account of his refusal to kowtow to dictated lines by then top political authorities.

To substantiate his assertion, Dr Gupta has attached hard copies of e-mail exchanged between the AIIMS director and Shashi Tharoor in an effort to prove that the e-mails were sent to influence the autopsy report, though the contents of the e-mail seem prima facie non-culpable. By all accounts, the sensationalisation of the high-profile case appears to be a collateral casualty of a saga of war on promotion being waged by faculty members of the forensic department at AIIMS.

Insiders in the premier institution say Gupta was promoted as head of the forensic department in 2013, bypassing another faculty member, Dr OP Murthy, who stood disqualified on account of certain indiscretions. With the new director taking charge, Dr Murthy’s disqualification was ignored at AIIMS’s general body meeting to pave way for his (Dr Murthy’s) elevation as the HoD.

Dr Gupta’s affidavit accuses the then union health minister, Ghulam Nabi Azad, of manipulating the situation in order to install an amenable person at the position of head of the forensic department. In Dr Gupta’s view, his refusal to given in to pressure in the Sunanda Pushkar case proved to be cause of his victimisation.

Apparently, Dr Gupta’s affidavit seems to be a clever ploy to re-ignite the controversy over the high-profile case and turn the heat on the director and political leaders who are incidentally in the opposition after 2014 Lok Sabha polls. Those aware of AIIMS politics admit that Dr Gupta’s disclosures are more meant as strategic tool to settle his score than to reveal something which would change the course of investigation into the crime mystery.

  Sunanda Report

Comments

 

Other News

Voter turnout: Drop from 2019 reduces further

As the voting percentages dropped drastically in the first couple of phases of the ongoing general elections, observers and analysts spoke of ‘voter apathy’ blamed it on a lack of “wave” this time – apart from the heatwave, that is. The latest figures after the fourth phase, h

GAIL reports annual revenue of Rs.1,30,638 crore

GAIL (INDIA) Limited has reported 75% increase in Profit before Tax (PBT) of Rs.11,555 crore in FY24,  as against Rs 6,584 Cr in FY23. Profit after Tax (PAT) in FY24 stands at Rs. 8,836 Cr as against Rs.5,302 Cr in FY23, a 67 % increase. However, revenue from operations registered a fa

Women move forward, one step at a time

“Women’s rights are not a privilege but a fundamental aspect of human rights.” —Savitribai Phule In India, where almost two-thirds of the population resides in rural areas, women’s empowerment initiatives are extremely critical for intensifying l

Why you should vote

What are the direct tangible benefits that you want from the government coming in power? The manifestos of various parties set a host of agendas which many times falls back in materialising the intended gains. Governance failures, policy lapses, implementation gaps, leadership crisis and cultural blockages

How the role of Ayurveda evolved pre- and post-independence

Ayurveda, Nation and Society: United Provinces, c. 1890–1950 By Saurav Kumar Rai Orient BlackSwan, 292 pages, Rs 1,400  

General Elections: Phase 4 voting on in 96 seats

As many as 17.7 crore electors are eligible to vote in the fourth phase of general elections taking place on Monday in 10 states/UTs. 175 Legislative Assembly seats of Andhra Pradesh and 28 Legislative Assembly seats of Odisha are also going to polls in this phase. Polling time in select as

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter