Ajit Singh wants airfare made public

Aviation analyst says it is difficult to get airlines to do this because it will reveal their business model

srishti

Srishti Pandey | March 14, 2013



Hitting back at airlines for refusing to divulge details of airfares and availability of seats in each fare slab civil aviation minister Ajit Singh has said that the companies cannot refuse to provide information as it is in the larger public interest.

Putting to rest the concerns of the airline companies that the move would result in regulation of airfares, the minister assured that the government did not intend to regulate fares even if it came across companies indulging in anti-competitive or predatory pricing. Instead, in such a situation the matter would be referred to the Competition Commission of India.

On January 23, the supreme court had directed airlines to furnish details regarding the number of seats available at each fare level but a final order has not been passed.

Meanwhile, experts have expressed their concerns on the move being implemented.

Speaking to Governance Now Sharan Lillaney, aviation analyst at Angel Broking said, “It is very difficult to get airlines to do this because it will reveal their business model and will increase the risk of rivals copying or misusing it.”

About the chances of the move being implemented, Lillaney said, “It does not seem very likely as the government, in the past, has said a lot of things but not everything has been implemented. Also, it does not make any sense for the government to worry about cartelisation in this sector as it is a loss-making sector.”

Echoing the sentiment, Rajiv Chib, associate director, PricewaterhouseCoopers said that airlines companies should be allowed a certain amount of privacy when it comes to deciding airfares. “That much privacy should be allowed and it would be more ethical to not force the move upon these companies.”

On being asked if the move would impact the attractiveness of the bleeding sector in the country, he replied, “It will not harm the prospects of foreign investment in the sector but this kind of regulatory interference is not desirable as it challenges the basic premise of liberalising the sector.”  

Comments

 

Other News

Framework for India-US Interim Agreement announced

India and the United States on Saturday announced they had agreed on an interim framework for an interim trade agreement, indicating a broad roadmap of the opening of the markets and reduction in trade tariffs on both sides. In a message on X, prime minister Narendra Modi said, “Great

India’s quiet rise as the world’s `Third Pole`

A silent re-calibration is going on in the international system, which is becoming more polarized, volatile, and entered of spheres of influence. The world does not evolve in the new era of bipolar competition of the United States and China, nor does it evolve on the setback of Russia in the role of a spoi

‘Tariff king’ to trade partner: Why Trump’s sudden U-turn surprises India

On February 2 at around 10 PM, Sergio Gor, who had become US ambassador to India just three weeks ago, posted a cryptic message on his official handle on X, stating, “President Trump just spoke with Prime Minister Modi. STAY TUNED….” This created a buzz across media in India as the two l

One overlooked skill for success: The art of saying no

The Power of Saying No!: Why Really Successful People Say No to Almost Everything By Ashutosh Garg Rupa Publications, 200 pages, Rs 395

US reduces tariffs on India to 18%

US president Donald Trump has announced a reduction on tariffs on Indian imports from a punitive 50% to 18%. He called prime minister Narendra Modi late Monday (India time) and then announced the decision on social media. Trump said India would now stop buying oil from Russia and will procure it from the U

If budget is driven by Yuva Shakti, what do youth think of it?

When the Union Budget 2026 was presented in Parliament, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman spoke with assurance about economic growth, innovation and employment-led development. Rising revenue receipts were cited as a sign of a widening tax base, while increased expenditure reflected the government’


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter