Apex court split over Jaya's plea

Two-member bench divided over appointment of special public prosecutor

shivani

Shivani Chaturvedi | April 16, 2015 | Chennai


#Jayalalithaa   #Jayalalithaa da case   #tamil nadu   #da case  

The supreme court on Wednesday gave a split verdict on a petition challenging the appointment of G Bhawani Singh as special public prosecutor in former Tamil Nadu chief minister Jayalalithaa’s disproportionate asset case.

Justice M B Lokur allowed the plea to remove the public prosecutor, but Justice R Banumathi argued the SPP had the authority to continue appeal in the Karnataka high court.

The verdict by the two-member bench has given anxious moment to Jaya loyalists and All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) members.

However, there are some who have hopes of an early return of Jayalalithaa as chief minister.

Meanwhile, it is not seen as an entirely unexpected development. Former bureaucrat MG Devasahayam, and convenor of Chennai-based Forum of Electoral Integrity, speaking to Governance Now says, “Some people in the judiciary are making all efforts since day one to bring Jayalalithaa out.”

“What for there is sudden transfer of Karnataka chief justice Dhirendra Hiralal Waghela?,” he comments.

Devasahayam further says, “Case was registered against Jayalalithaa in 1997. In the same year Dravida Munnetra Kazhgam (DMK) chief, M Karunanidhi, the then chief minister, had set up special courts to try cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, which included cases against Jayalalithaa too. Jayalalithaa challenged the decision in the Madras high court, where chief justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan heard it along with Justice D Raju. Before it could come to a verdict, Justice Raju was elevated as chief justice of Himachal Pradesh high court. As Justice Librehan was hearing the case he was about to be transferred to Guwahati high court, a transfer within six months of taking over as the Madras high court chief justice.”

“We started agitation against this. With the intervention of  the then prime minister IK Gujralm, the transfer was held up and Liberhan continued at Madras high court,” he recollects.

Finally the decision supported the setting up of special courts, thus leading to trial of Jayalalithaa. However, within a few weeks, Justice Liberhan was shifted to Andhra Pradesh high court. “So, sudden transfers in this case have taken place in the past also. It’s a dirty game being played by some people in the judiciary. The entire system is collapsing,” Devasahayam expresses concern.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Creation of ‘good bank’ as important as ‘bad bank’ for NPA management

After the recent announcement of the government guarantee for Security Receipts (SRs) to be issued by a public sector-owned National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL), there is a surge of interest around this desi version of a super bad bank. The entity will acquire around ₹2 trillion bad debts fr

V shape recovery an exaggeration: Gurcharan Das

The notion of a V-shape economic recovery is an exaggeration, and the informal economy and the poor have been terribly hurt during the Covid-19 period, says Gurcharan Das, author, commentator and public intellectual. “A V-shape recovery is an exaggeration. The informal economy and the

Covid-19 antibodies found in 86.64% Mumbai citizens

As many as 86.64% citizens of the city of Greater Mumbai have antibodies, according to the fifth sero-prevalence survey. Among the people who are fully or partially vaccinated, the antibodies were found in 90.26%, while among the unvaccinated citizens, 79.86% had antibodies. The Municipal C

`Bad Bank`: All you wanted to know about NARCL

The cabinet has cleared the formation of ‘National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited’ (NARCL) which will acquire “stressed assets” of about Rs. 2 Lakh crore in phases within RBI regulations in order to address the problem of humongous amounts of bad loans in public sector banks.

Citizens Charter: How this less-known law empowers us

When consumer rights and RTI activist Mohammad Afzal was shifting to a new residence in a different area, he required changes in various documents. He decided to take the help of the Citizens Charter along with other friends who also required similar work with authorities. The Citizens Chart

Minister for Ports, Shipping & Waterways emphasises on setting up of National Transport Facilitation Committees

Union Minister for Ports, Shipping & Waterways and AYUSH, Sarbananda Sonowal has underlined the importance of cross-border connectivity among India and developing nations of South-East Asia. Addressing the ASEAN summit on Future of India-ASEAN Connectivity Partnerships virt

Visionary Talk: Gurcharan Das, Author, Commentator & Public Intellectual on key governance issues


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter