Are the interlocutors speaking for the centre?

Whatever the answer, the next question is: why?

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | October 28, 2010



If somebody were to tell you that the solution to the Kashmir imbroglio will have to be found outside the ambit of the constitution, you will dismiss the suggestion without so much as a second thought. If the same is said by somebody authorised by the central government, though, it is a matter of serious concern. The three-member team of interlocutors sent by the centre to the valley has repeatedly struck discordant notes – it started off by saying that Pakistan will have to be engaged to arrive at any solution on Kashmir. Either the team has seriously mistaken its brief or somebody down there in the ivory tower of New Delhi has got a startlingly original conception of the role of interlocutors.

Interlocutor is commonly understood to be someone who is involved in a conversation and who is representing someone else. When the centre announced the team comprising Dileep Padgaonkar, M M Ansari and Radha Kumar, it was expected that these three would engage with various political and social sections in the valley on behalf of the centre. Of course, there was widespread apprehension that this team would not carry much weight. The move signalled desperation on part of the centre, which, in the absence of political will to crack the whip on its coalition partner in the Omar Abdullah-led government in the state, was clearly clutching at straws in the wind. The team of interlocutors then has surprised not as much in its inefficacy, which was expected, but in its political impropriety.

Are these interlocutors speaking for the central government? If so, why isn’t the prime minister spelling out such significant policy shifts instead? If the answer is no, who are the interlocutors speaking for? In either case, then, the interlocutors have no business to issue such statements. There is of course a third possibility. If the idea was really to deflect attention from Omar Abdullah in the first place, the interlocutors seem to be doing handsomely. Else, it is time they stopped making policy announcements and got on with their limited job at hand.

Comments

 

Other News

Uday Kotak on history, Indian economy, growth and more

Pathbreakers: How 10 Visionary Leaders Transformed India by award-winning journalists  By Sucheta Dalal and Debashis Basu Rupa Publications, 304 pages, Rs 695  

₹5,000 crore saved from suspected financial fraud

In a significant gain for citizen protection in the digital economy, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has helped prevent suspected cyber fraud losses of more than ₹5,000 crore through its Financial Fraud Risk Indicator (FRI) within fifteen months of its launch on May 22, 2025. This money did

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter