Army, air force differ in defence priorities

Army says focus on Pak, China, but air force eyes a comprehensive build up

trithesh

Trithesh Nandan | October 15, 2010



Hours after army chief general VK Singh said that Pakistan and China are the two main “irritants” for India, air chief marshal P V Naik appeared to be more laidback regarding both nations.

He said, “The Air Force will go for comprehensive capability build up rather than threat specific development.”

Speaking at the 5th International conference on energising Indian aerospace industry in New Delhi, Naik said on Friday, “We have a long term specific plan which stretches up to 2022 and even up to 2027 where we have specified the types of capabilities extrapolating from the notes available now and build it on that direction.”

He also added that the air force is  focussed on capability build-up based on the country’s aspirations. This, he said, will be reviewed every three years or five years.

Earlier today the army chief in a seminar had spoken on how Pakistan is building terror infrastructure on India's western border and Beijing’s rising military aspirations are cause of concern from the north and the northeast.

“We have two irritants. One, mainly in terms of how the situation is, in Pakistan where there is a problem of governance, where there is certain amount of support that is being given to some terrorists and where the internal situation is not very good,”  Singh said, addressing a seminar on ‘Indian Army: Emerging Roles and Tasks’ in New Delhi.

The army chief said that India has to take the terror infrastructure in Pakistan very serioously.

With China there is a border dispute, he added, “We have a rising China, both economically and militarily. Although we have CBMs in place, we have a very stable border, yet we have a border dispute.”

The army chief’s reaction came after news that China is planning to expand its rail line to Nyangtri, a city located right on the border of Arunachal Pradesh.

Comments

 

Other News

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake

What the US–Iran peace deal means for India

After months of rising tensions, the United States and Iran have reached a memorandum of understanding called the "Islamabad Agreement." This agreement allows for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and provides Iran with relief from sanctions, depending on its complianc

V. M. Tarkunde: A legal luminary par excellence

14 Lawyers: Portraits from The Bar By Raju Ramachandran  Juggernaut, 248 pages, Rs. 799  

The Cost of Obesity

The latest episode of Checks and Balances focuses on the ticking time bomb of obesity in India, and Geetanjali Minhas of Governance Now spoke with a panel of experts. You can watch the episode here: https://youtu.be/mH

US-Iran deal: Path to peace or prelude to deeper regional quagmire?

In the midst of deep mistrust, the US and Iran are reported to have reached a framework deal for ending the West Asian conflict. But whether it will result in any meaningful breakthrough or pave the way for any lasting peace in the region, is in the realm of speculation.   During

Lived life, philosophy, spirituality and other enigmas

The Ashes Are Warm: Memories of a Lifetime Spent with UG Krishnamurti By Mahesh Bhatt and Sunita Pant Bansal Rupa Publications, 384 pages, Rs 495  





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter