Centre can't regulate pvt firms on land acquisition:NAC member

Terms a key clause in GoI's proposed land acquisition bill as "unconstitutional"

PTI | September 1, 2011



National Advisory Council member N C Saxena on Thursday termed as "unconstitutional" a key clause in the proposed land acquisition Act which binds private firms buying 100 acre or more to follow the rehabilitation package, as suggested in the draft bill.

According to the draft National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation & Resettlement Bill, 2011, the rehabilitation provision would be mandatory if private companies buy 100 acre or more on their own.

"This is unconstitutional. The government of India cannot decide how much land can be bought. The Centre cannot control this, (whereas) state can control this through various laws including Land Ceiling Act," Saxena said at an Assocham conference here.

This provision should be removed from the draft bill, he added.

NAC, headed by Congress president Sonia Gandhi, is a high-level body advising the government on UPA's (United Progressive Alliance) flagship programmes like MGNREGA (Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act) and Food Security Bill.

Under the draft land acquisition bill, the farmers will be given a compensation of not less than twice the market value in urban areas. In rural areas, the same should be at least six times the market price.

The clause has also been opposed by real estate industry.

"No private land acquisition should be covered under the proposed Act. If this is done, housing prices will go up multi-fold," CREDAI President Lalit Kumar Jain had recently said.

However, Saxena, who helped the government in drafting the bill, said that the other provisions of the proposed law are reasonable for all the stakeholders.

He said if farmers are given adequate compensation, they are "keen to go out of agriculture". The real issue, according to him, was compensation.

Citing the Posco example, NAC member said if farmers were paid good compensation, the company would not have faced agitation.

Comments

 

Other News

₹5,000 crore saved from suspected financial fraud

In a significant gain for citizen protection in the digital economy, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has helped prevent suspected cyber fraud losses of more than ₹5,000 crore through its Financial Fraud Risk Indicator (FRI) within fifteen months of its launch on May 22, 2025. This money did

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter