Clarify on usage of Sindh in national anthem: HC to Centre

A PIL challenges the use of the word 'Sindh' in the national anthem and seeking its replacement with 'Sindhu'

PTI | September 7, 2011



Observing that the Supreme Court had in its order five years back held that the word 'Sindh' is correctly used in the national anthem, the Bombay high court on Wednesday directed the union government to clarify about the correct usage of the word.

A division bench of justices Ranjana Desai and R G Ketkar was hearing a public interest litigation challenging the use of the word 'Sindh' in the national anthem and seeking its replacement with 'Sindhu'.

According to the PIL filed by retired professor Shreekanth Malushte, the word 'Sindh' was replaced with 'Sindhu' in January 1950 by the Government of India.

The petitioner's counsel Niranjan Mogre pointed out to the high court that as per the information received by them from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) under the RTI, the correct version of the anthem includes the word 'Sindhu'.

"MHA claims it is Sindhu but Supreme Court in its judgment has quoted the national anthem and has used the word Sindh. As of now we are going as per the apex court's decision. Maybe MHA has made some mistake in its RTI reply," justice Desai remarked.

Directing the central government to look into the SC verdict before filing its reply, Justice Desai said, "You (government) better be careful. Its a matter of our national anthem."

According to the PIL, when the anthem was composed in 1917 by Rabindranath Tagore, "Sindh" was part of India but now it is in Pakistan.

However, "the national anthem continues to be sung and broadcast in a wrong manner by using incorrect words," it said.

Comments

 

Other News

₹5,000 crore saved from suspected financial fraud

In a significant gain for citizen protection in the digital economy, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has helped prevent suspected cyber fraud losses of more than ₹5,000 crore through its Financial Fraud Risk Indicator (FRI) within fifteen months of its launch on May 22, 2025. This money did

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter