Every fourth MP may have a conflict of interest: study

Social watchdog expresses concern over 25 per cent of Lok Sabha MPs belonging to category of industrialists, traders, businessmen & builders

trithesh

Trithesh Nandan | December 21, 2010



The union urban development minister S Jaipal Reddy on Tuesday warned that nearly a fourth of the members of the Lok Sabha could harbour a conflict of interest with the house's business, quoting a study.  "When rich people come into Parliament, can you avoid a conflict of interest," was the minister's rhetorical poser at the release of the Citizen's report on governance and development 2010, based on a study conducted by the National Social Watch Coalition (NSWC).

The NSWC report said, “One hundred and twenty-eight out of 543 members in the 15th Lok Sabha belong to the industrialist/trader/businessperson/builder category, which potentially forms conflict of interest.”

The report also gave few examples of conflict of interest in the  Rajya Sabha. “CPI (M) Brinda Karat opposed industrialist Rahul Bajaj asking a question relating to automobile industry regarding the steps taken by the finance ministry to ameliorate the problems faced by the industry during the financial crisis,” the report cited from the proceedings of the house on December 15, 2008.

Karat had also sought reconsideration of Rule 294, Clause 1 under which a member can declare conflict of interest before they speak. “Given the reality that industrialists and/or their associates/employees are honourable members of the House, it has become a common occurrence and will therefore extend from conflict of interest to a conflict of dignity of the house,” she had said.

The report also mentioned that membership of several standing committees have also been dominated by such members. “About any conflict of interest, the potential can never be undermined,” the report noted. “Importance of parliament as legislative body and seriousness of that has considerably reduced. It is a great concern which citizen should look at,” Himanshu Jha, convenor of the NSWC told Governance Now.

Some members of the Lok Sabha also had incremental jumps in wealth during its last term (2004-2009), the study noted. According to the report, “There was increase of wealth by 3,023 percent of Congress MP L Rajagopal since 2004.” The other MPs in the club of those with more than a thousand percent increase in assets are Uday Singh (BJP), H D Kumarswamy JD(S), D Napoleon (DMK) and Ambica Banerjee (AITC).

Public Interest Litigation (PIL)

The report indicated that less than one percent of PIL’s demanding intervention were heard by the Supreme Court. According to the report, “In 2008, the SC received 24,666 letters, postcards, or petitions asking for its intervention in cases that might be considered public interest litigations. Of these, only 226 were placed before judges on admission days, and only a small fraction of these were heard as regular hearing matters. The rest were rejected.”

The total backlog of cases pending in all High Courts on December 31, 2009, was a whopping 40,76,837, according to the report's data. It also mentioned that Allahabad high court has maximum backlog of cases.  

Top performing MPs fail to get re-elected

The report names Trichur MP C K Chandrappan as the best performing parliamentarian in the 14th Lok Sabha (2004 to 2009) amid the heavyweights like Sonia Gandhi, Pranab Mukherjee, Kapil Sibal, L.K. Advani, Lalu Yadav, Ramvilas Paswan or even Md. Salim who are better known names among the public and media.

But the report said, “Sadly, Chandrappan failed to get the nod of electorate in the elections to the 15th Lok Sabha.” This not only happened with Chandrappan but with six other MPs who were among the top ten performers in Parliament. “You see the 10 MPs, they are the unsung heroes of parliament but hardly get mentioned,” Jha said.

The report named just one member from the biggies - BJP's Hansraj Gangaram Ahir and Congress's Salarapatty Kuppusamy Kharventhan among the top ten Parliamentarians.

The list assessed MPs on four parameters – attendance, participation in debates, number of questions asked and number of private members’ bills (PMBs) proposed and surveyed all the 545 MPs. 

The study also said that number of bills passed witnessed a decline from 47 in 2008 to 41 in 2009.

Comments

 

Other News

Caring for cancer patients: the expanded network of facilities

Health is a State subject, and the primary responsibility for providing healthcare services, including cancer care, rests with the respective state governments. However, the Department of Health and Family Welfare provides technical and financial support to States and Union Territories across the country

Capabilities, aspirations of India’s youth limitless: Modi

The capabilities and aspirations of India’s youth are limitless, prime minister Narendra Modi said in his remarks to the media at the start of monsoon session of the parliament on Monday.  "In the past month, the country has achieved many milestones, filling citiz

India gets the first hydrogen train

Prime minister Narendra Modi on Friday laid the foundation stone and dedicated to the nation various development projects worth around ₹14,700 crore in Jind, Haryana.   The PM positioned the city as a shining reflection of the good governance model. Emphasizing that the entire Haryana

Climate change is stealing sleep

Climate change has at least doubled the temperature-related sleep loss across 1,338 major cities worldwide over the past five decades, highlighting an emerging but often overlooked public health consequence of rising global temperatures. A new study by Climate Central estimates that between 2020 and

Cabinet approves Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme

The union cabinet chaired by PM Narendra Modi has approved the Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme (MPMS) with a budgetary outlay of Rs 62,500 crore. It aims to further scale up the production, deepen domestic value addition, strengthen supply chain resilience, enhance global competitiveness. It

Building infrastructure is only half the job

Recent stories of stolen railway wires, disappearing communication towers and missing public infrastructure are often treated as bizarre law-and-order failures of India. Yet they raise a more fundamental question. Why does the State often discover the disappearance of a public asset only after it has alrea

Upcoming Conferences





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter