How an NGO deflated Roman arrogance for ragpickers

With all the resources and responsibility bestowed upon them in the constitution, the Indian state is failing to protect the majesty of the supreme court of India

rohit

Rohit Bansal | March 14, 2013




While the nation’s chief executive and his external affairs minister mumble and fumble over the insult Rome has handed to India’s supreme court by refusing to return the two Italian marines accused of murdering Indian fishermen, here’s what Chintan, a determined civil society group, did to save the honour of a simple ragpicker against Alitalia, an arrogant Italian globocorp.

The face off, now remembered only by a handful, occurred in 2006. Remember, this was before twitter and facebook. In those times, “viral” was still a flu you’d want to wish away. But sheer honesty of purpose made Chintan vs. Alitalia, India’s equivalent of the more aggressively marketed Dave Carroll vs. United Airlines.

Also reda: Rome has tricked chief justice of India, own envoy

The David versus Goliath story is beyond the three instances of Italian misbehaviour cited by BJP leader Arun Jaitley in his, "Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times, it's enemy action," quote from the Bond novel Goldfinger.

I expect this fourth episode to be dug up as it conveys what some Italian entities think they are.

In this story, here’s this Alitalia manager at New Delhi airport, Mr Sood, so eager to please the goras, that he stops a paying passenger, the rag picker, Santraj Maurya, from boarding a Belo Horizonte-bound flight.

Mr Sood isn’t satisfied that Mr Maurya can complete the complicated tourney all by himself. So, all he does is to bump off Mr Maurya and offer him a refund!

Alitalia later justified its action as "judicious discrimination." It insisted that it had the authority to turn away a paying passenger, as rights of admission are reserved!

For those tuning in today, Maurya was to attend a waste pickers' fest in the Brazilian city. But as “Down To Earth” reported at that time, the J-class ticket his sponsors gave him wasn't considered sufficient for a "passenger profile" worthy of Alitalia.

“Angry reactions from Chintan, the NGO Maurya is affiliated with, did pressurise the airline into issuing an apology. But that's small consolation. Maurya lost a chance of meeting fellow waste pickers from Latin America and Egypt and sharing experiences with them.”

Bharati Chaturvedi, the Chintan founder who anchored the charge against Alitalia, has a powerful message on why a Euro 3.4 billion (today’s figures) had to give Maurya, a business class ticket -- valid for three years -- to fly anywhere where the airline operates and the option to swap the business class ticket for three economy class tickets.

It’s conviction against injustice!

"We hope the Government of India, and the Ministry of External Affairs is inspired by the leadership of waste pickers in fighting against injustice," she says in an email.

“At Chintan, we saw ourselves as working in the public interest to ensure an equitable and sustainable India for everyone. We are a small NGO but we are committed to standing up and fighting for what is right. Despite being short staffed, fund starved and without much access to the media, and having to handle Alitalia's stubborn, aggressive bull-dog lawyer (we did not have a lawyer and still cannot afford one), we invested our time in building a constituency of global support through smart communications and persistence. The truth prevailed because we fought for it to prevail using our minds-the only resource we had unlimited access to. Alitalia bowed down. It was a David versus Goliath moment for the waste pickers of the country.”

"The incident reminded us, once again, that waste pickers lie at the bottom of the heap. Unless we can get a policy that acknowledges their work, waste pickers will be treated shabbily," Chaturvedi, had said in an earlier interview in Down To Earth.

Alitalia’s subsequent correspondence with DGCA, the air safety regulator, showed that the Indian ground staff "denied boarding (to Maurya) because of his 'inability to manage such a complicated trip,’ and ‘in the best interest and safety of Mr Maurya and other passengers.’”

Ha!

Await the explanation our PM and his Roman compatriots will now have for grounding the chief justice’s order!
 

Comments

 

Other News

₹5,000 crore saved from suspected financial fraud

In a significant gain for citizen protection in the digital economy, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has helped prevent suspected cyber fraud losses of more than ₹5,000 crore through its Financial Fraud Risk Indicator (FRI) within fifteen months of its launch on May 22, 2025. This money did

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter