The new terminal remains grossly under-utilised even as New Delhi railway station is under-equipped for load
Jasleen Kaur | May 19, 2010
Sunday's stampede at the New Delhi railway station was explained away as a 'trip-up' by the following evening. But as anyone who has boarded or deboarded a train there would tell you, the tragedy remains a case of too little for too many. From space, seating, to foot-over-bridges - the station simply has not been built to handle the traffic it does. The Railways probe committee might choose to hide behind euphemisms, but the uncomfortable admission of some officials is that the station has far from adequate infrastructure for managing the crowds that throng its platforms during announcements and in between.
Congested stairs between foot over-bridge and platform at New Delhi railway station caused the stampede
However, the railways was not playing the fiddle exactly while the stampede was in the making - the spanking new yet shamefully underutilised Anand Vihar railway terminal can vouch for it.
Built at a cost of Rs 240 cr and spread over 6,000 sqm, the terminal was inaugurated last December to ease some of the pressure off the New Delhi station by shifting some trains here. Six months later it serves three to four east-bound (Bihar, UP, WB) trains - and from May 1, some summer special trains. It doesn't even begin to scratch at the figure of 272 trains that start and end at New Delhi railway station - so much for easing the burden.
Railway officials are quick with their defence for the delay in making the terminal fully functional. Blame is volleyed between shortage of staff, delay in construction of platforms 1 and 2, to a highway on the route that delayed laying of tracks.
A highway between Sahibabad and Anand Vihar, reportedly, delayed the laying of the tracks to the terminal by couple of months. A December deadline only made sure that all efforts went into making at least one track ready for inauguration by then. Thus, while platform 3 was ready for use, platforms 1 and 2 could be up and running only by February this year.
Some officials, in rare introspection for the department, even blame some peers for pandering to their whims instead of looking out for the best interests of the passengers and the railways itself. They claim that some offcials from outside Delhi, want trains plying to their region to start from New Delhi.
The new railway terminal at Anand Vihar
Part of the reason for a luke warm response from the public could also have been the limited commutation options to the Anand Vihar terminal from other parts of Delhi. But with the Metro service now available literally at the its door-step, this problem also has been long remedied.
Whatever be the reason(s), the fact that New Delhi railway station is balking under pressure is there for all to see. On the day of the stampede, the site of the tragedy, platforms 12 and 13, were lost beneath 14,000 pairs of feet. All this while both platforms can collectively hold a maximum of 5,000 people. The Anand Vihar terminal, meanwhile, barely evens feel the presence (pic) of the 4,000-4,500 footfalls it records daily.
Now, in the aftermath of the stampede, the Railways is talking about making greater use of the Anand Vihar railway terminal - it is mulling more trains running to and from West Bengal, Orissa, Jharkhand being shifted here - but does it not seem like 'adequate, but late'?
Maharashtra has emerged the epicentre of the Novel Coronavirus outbreak in the country with Mumbai reporting the highest number of cases in the state. With more and more healthcare providers getting infected, hospitals are becoming the hotbeds of virus perpetuation. On Monday Wockhardt hosp
As Indians switched off lights in homes and lighted lamps and candles Sunday night following prime minister Narendra Modi’s appeal as a gesture of solidarity in the fight against COVID-19, the power grid held up well despite the sudden drop in demand. In a short video message on Friday
Contrary to the perception that the elderly are more at risk from Covid-19, in India as many as 41.88% of corona positive cases are between 21 to 40 years of age. Also, 32.82% positive cases are between 41 to 60 years, followed by 16.69% cases above the age of 60 years and 8.61% coronavirus positive cases
In view of the increasing number of COVID -19 cases in the country, the ministry of health and family welfare (MoHFW) has now advised that everyone must voluntarily wear a mask and especially those living in densely populated areas. Not just as a matter of maintaining personal hygiene
In the face of the Covid-19 pandemic, people of India have realized their collective strength, prime minister Narendra Modi said in a short video message Friday morning. He also urged people to light lamps Sunday night as a gesture of this collectivity. “Today marks nine days of the na
Demobilization, like its predecessor – demonetization, is another decision gone bad in implementation. In both instances a careful public administrative action through its governance systems could have saved the magnitude of impact particularly on the most vulnerable sections of the society. Th