India Inc dismisses proposal for mandatory CSR

Also raises other concerns over new companies bill

sweta-ranjan

Sweta Ranjan | February 17, 2011


Corporate affairs minister Murli Deora
Corporate affairs minister Murli Deora

India Inc has rejected the government's move to make corporate social responsibility mandatory and force companies to earmark 2 percent of their profits for the same.

Corporate affairs minister Murli Deora said, after an interactive session with representatives of the industry on Thursday, "We have extensively discussed the issue of mandatory CSR. The industry seems to happily accept this mandate but no decision has yet been taken on this." The minister added, "As per my opinion, 2 percent levy on social responsibility should be made mandatory."

Contrary to the minister's claims, however, representatives of the industry seemed united in rejecting the suggestion outright. Suresh C Senapaty, executive director and CFO, Wipro, said, "It should not be made mandatory. We suggest adequate disclosure of the CSR but making it mandatory would lead to another scam."

IL&FS Environment Infrastructure and Services Ltd, CFO S N Mukherjee also felt that the mandatory 2% CSR would not work well. "Industry is bound to be dissatisfied with this kind of step. We would appreciate if voluntary CSR is there,” he said.
 
Industry bodies CII, FICCI and Assocham too strongly opposed the move towards mandatory CSR. Many representatives of corporate india present in the interactive session even said they did not know what exactly CSR meant. "What happens if there is no profit in a particular year,” was just one of the vexing points of debate. 
 
Deora, along with his junior minister RPN Singh and secretary MCA D K Mittal met with the corporate representatives to discuss revision in the companies law.
 
Besides CSR, issues relating to independent directors, such as their empanelment with the ministry, remuneration and tenure were also discussed. Sources say the industry did not accept the idea of restricted number of independent directors. The companies demanded "freedom to companies" over remuneration as well. The proposed tenure of a maximum six years was also outrightly opposed by the industry.
 
The industry expressed concern over the rotation of auditors as well, arguing that it takes at least two years for an auditor to understand the company and its processes. The same happened over  the International Financial Rating Standards (IFRS) as the industry felt it was not compatible with the system prevalent in India.
 
 

Comments

 

Other News

Charming tales of the Snakeman’s early years

Snakes, Drugs and Rock ’N’ Roll: My Early Years By Romulus Whitaker with Janaki Lenin HarperCollins, 400 pages, Rs 699

Gripping graphic narrative helps make sense of pandemics past

The Moral Contagion By Julia Hauser and Sarnath Banerjee HarperCollins, 140 pages, Rs 699 The world has lar

“Globally, there is unprecedented positivity for India”

Addressing the Viksit Bharat Viksit Uttar Pradesh program in Lucknow on Monday, prime minister Narendra Modi launched 14,000 projects across the state, worth more than Rs 10 lakh crore at the fourth groundbreaking ceremony of UP Global Investors Summit held in February 2023. The projects relate to sectors

World’s biggest bird-a-thon begins in India

During the four days from Feb 16, more than a thousand birdwatchers throughout India are coming together with the goal of documenting as many birds as possible across the country’s diverse locations. Over one lakh birdwatchers globally participate in the annual Great Backyard Bird Coun

Comments sought on Draft Guidelines for Prevention of Misleading Advt in Coaching Sector

The Central Consumer Protection Authority has sought public comments on the ‘Draft Guidelines for Prevention of Misleading Advertisement in Coaching Sector’. The draft guidelines are placed on the website of the Department of Consumer Affairs and are accessible through the link:

Electoral bond scheme unconstitutional: Supreme Court

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has held the anonymous, unregulated and unlimited funding through electoral bonds and companies as unconstitutional. The five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court comprising chief justice DY Chandrachud and justices Sanjiv Khanna, B

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter