Land bill faces criticism from activists too

In the name of public purpose and inclusive growth, it will only aggravate conflicts, says NAPM

GN Bureau | August 30, 2013


A tribal farmer in Gujarat in his maize field.
A tribal farmer in Gujarat in his maize field.

The Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill 2011, passed by the Lok Sabha on Thursday, has faced criticism not only from the industry but also from civil society activists.

ALSO READ: Jairam Ramesh on why the land bill is a landmark

The National Alliance for People’s Movements, a platform of a host of NGOs working on various rights issues, has said it “welcomes the introduction of a comprehensive bill and recognition of resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) as right but is disappointed at the neglect of ground realities and legitimacy of acquisition for 'private profit' in the name of public purpose”.

This brazen push for land acquisition for private companies will threaten food security and livelihood of millions, it said in a press statement signed by Medha Patkar of the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) and others.

“For decades people's movements have been struggling against the forced land acquisition, without any recourse to satisfactory R&R. Today, in an atmosphere, where everything from roads, hospital to tourism, mining, electricity developed by public or private corporations, is considered as public good, we feel that Bill will continue to betray the faith of people in development process. Since 1947, millions of hectares of land have been acquired in the name of development, displacing nearly 100 million people and leaving them to fend for themselves.”

Though the attempt to repeal the original act of 1894 was initiated in the context of the killings and land conflict in Nandigram and Singur, today the whole debate is centred only on the growth and industrialisation, NAPM noted. “Political and elite class of this country is driving this hype at the cost of alienating large section of population, who will only have the option to resist and challenge forced acquisition of their land and natural resources by corporations in name of development and growth.”

While NAPM welcomed some provisions like social impact assessment and concurrent environmental impact assessment, it is concerned that “historical justice has not been done”.

The signatories includes Dr. Sunilam, Aradhna Bhargava, Prafulla Samantara, Gautam Bandopadhyay, Ulka Mahajan, Suniti SR, Prasad Bagwe,  Gabriel Dietrich, Geetha Ramakrishnan,  Rajendra Ravi, Anita Kapoor,  Akhil Gogoi, Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey,  Sister Celia,  Sumit Wanjale, Madhuri Shivkar, Simpreet Singh,  Dr. Rupesh Verma,  Manish Gupta,  Vimal Bhai, Vilas Bhongade,  Ramashray Singh, and Anand Mazhgaonkar.

NAPM's detailed note on concerns: read more here. 

Comments

 

Other News

“Indians, yet treated like outsiders”

Moving to Delhi-NCR for education can be an exciting experience for students from Northeast India. It gives us a chance to meet new people, experience a different culture and become more independent. But living away from home also comes with challenges that people who have not experienced them may not al

Import duty on major edible oils cut

The government has reduced the Basic Customs Duty (BCD) on major imported crude edible oils with a view to moderating domestic edible oil prices, providing relief to consumers and mitigating inflationary pressures arising from the sharp increase in international edible oil prices.  

From pyramid to platform: BRICS agenda for Global South

In his opening address at the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi on September 12, prime minister Narendra Modi did something India`s diplomacy has been building towards for three years: he moved the ‘Voice of the Global South’ from a slogan to a work plan. Addressing the leaders, he argued that t

How to realise the full transformative potential of PM-JAY

The Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY), a welfare scheme which covers approximately 45 crore beneficiaries across India, provides cashless health cover of Rs. 5 lakh per family per year. It is the largest health insurance scheme which helped crores of poor families by reducing out-of-pocket expend

The missing men in India`s family planning story

Every pregnancy requires two people. Yet India`s family planning programme continues to ask only one of them to bear almost all of its medical consequences. The newly released National Family Health Survey-6 (2023-24) confirms just how entrenched this asymmetry remains: 36.5% of currently married women a

`Development must be judged beyond GDP, with rights and justice at core`

Delivering the IXth Chief Justice M.C. Chagla Memorial Lecture on ‘Human Rights and Sustainable Development Goals’, in Mumbai Friday,  former Chief Justice of India Bhushan R. Gavai questioned whether conventional economic indicators such as gross domestic product (GDP), national income,

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter