Modi, Gujarati farmer and a map of development myths

36 gram sabhas come together, oppose diverting farm land for ‘SIR’ and Maruti plant

ashishm

Ashish Mehta | May 31, 2013



Prime minister Manmohan Singh and planning commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia have often spoken of the neoliberal dream of taking farmers and their land away from agriculture. Nobody has worked towards that objective as zealously as Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi, granting land at throwaway prices to Adanis and Nirma and DLF of the Robert Vadra fame.

This efficiency of the Gujarat government in getting land for industry has been hailed by the corporate leaders and sections of the media and commentators. They compare Singur and Sanand – how Tata Motors left West Bengal over land acquisition problems and how Modi ensured land for them (not to mention unprecedented tax breaks). They also believe that the Gujarat farmer is very pragmatic, not sentimental, about the farm land, and given the right price does not mind moving out of agriculture.

Which is of course humbug. If Gujarat has been industrialising at a hectic pace, there have been several Singurs along the way – except that the administration clamps down on the protests more efficiently than UPA ever could on those Anna Hazare-Swami Ramdev movements.

Take the Mahuva agitation for example.

READ MORE: Gujarat villages stand as rock against Nirma cement factory

Audacity of their hope

The Nirma group of Karsan Patel wanted to set up a cement factory under a Vibrant Gujarat proposal, and the state government gave it a piece of ‘fallow land’, on which stands water body. Farmers said they didn’t want jobs in the cement factory, they wanted water for farms. The state government refused to listen and maintained there was no water body, it was a fallow land. Indeed, a three-minister team went to the spot and could not find the water body! The agitation started in 2008, and in 2011 the supreme court ordered Nirma to stop the work – exposing the state government’s lies to favour Patel.

Between 2008 and 2011, when farmers and civil society leaders took out a march from Mahuva town in Saurashtra to the state capital Gandhinagar, thousands – including nonagenarian Gandhian Chunibhai Vaidya – were detained in Ahmedabad for the whole day. How can a nonagenarian Gandhian be a threat to law and order?

Gujarat’s civil society, whose morale was boosted by the success of Mahuva, is now campaigning against land gifts to industry. The latest episode is from Mandal-Becharaji (MB) belt, in Mehsana district, where Maruti Suzuki’s manufacturing facility is to come up.

The proposed plant could get caught in a crossfire between farmers and the state government, as 36 of the 44 gram sabhas in the region on Thursday passed a resolution to oppose the status of special investment region (SIR) being given to the MB belt, reports the Business Standard.

Like their counterparts in Mahuva, farmers from this region are not opposed to the plant, but to diverting their fertile land for industry. The leader of the Mahuva movement, a then BJP MLA named Kanubhai Kalsariya, is now active in Mehsana. The Business Standard quoted him as saying that "Farmers of these villages waited endlessly for the Narmada water to flow. Even as their wait was about to end, the government came out with the notification of acquiring the land.

Meanwhile, earlier this week, farmers from Vadodara district finally succeeded in getting the supreme court to stop Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation (GETCO) from acquiring parts of the grazing land. When the Vadodara district collector decided last year to acquire about 5,000 sq m land from the grazing patch, the Luna gram panchayat filed a PIL in the high court. When the high court rejected the petition, they went to the apex court.

Then, of course, farmers in Bhavnagar district have been protesting against taking their land away from them for the proposed nuclear power plant at Mithi Virdi. Then, there is a proposal to acquire land near the Sardar Sarovar dam to develop tourism (never a part of the original Narmada project, which itself is going nowhere, and yet plans are afoot to render some more people homeless). Then, there is the redoubtable Adani’s Mundra port and SEZ project which has got 6,000 acres of land, putting environmental norms aside (it got a show-cause notice). Chunibhai Vaidya has been leading an agitation of local people against this land grab too.

Comments

 

Other News

Former president Ram Nath Kovind on some of his unforgettable journeys

Triumph of the Indian Republic: My Life, My Struggles By Ram Nath Kovind Rupa Publications, 400 pages, Rs 795   All our presidents so far stand out, each for a different reason. Ram Nath Kovind, the 14th president of India, from 2017 t

Uday Kotak on history, Indian economy, growth and more

Pathbreakers: How 10 Visionary Leaders Transformed India by award-winning journalists  By Sucheta Dalal and Debashis Basu Rupa Publications, 304 pages, Rs 695  

₹5,000 crore saved from suspected financial fraud

In a significant gain for citizen protection in the digital economy, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has helped prevent suspected cyber fraud losses of more than ₹5,000 crore through its Financial Fraud Risk Indicator (FRI) within fifteen months of its launch on May 22, 2025. This money did

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter