NCPRI demands minutes of data protection meeting

Civil society group asks justice Srikrishna to make public the draft Data Protection Bill circulated by the IT ministry

GN Bureau | January 3, 2018


#NCPRI   #Right to Information   #Privacy   #Data Protection   #Data Protection Bill   #Aruna Roy  


The National Campaign for Peoples' Right to Information (NCPRI) has written to justice BN Srikrishna, head of the the committee of experts examining the data protection framework, voicing concern about the lack of information in the public domain about committee's functioning.

In its letter, the civil society group has brought to notice the lack of information in public domain about the dates of the meetings, the agenda of the meetings and most importantly the minutes of the meetings. When the NCPRI sought (the RTI query attached) the agenda and minutes of the meeting under the right to information law, the ministry of electronics and IT (MEITY), denied giving information, stating, “This information currently is not in public domain”.

"The denial of information is in violation of the RTI Act as there is no legal provision to deny information merely because it is not in the public domain. Information can only be denied if it is exempt under section 8 or 9 of the RTI law. While we are following the formal channels of appeal under the RTI Act, we request you to kindly take steps to ensure that information about the functioning of the committee is placed in the public domain," the NCPRI wrote in its letter.

The civil society organisation, whose members include Aruna Roy, Anjali Bhardwaj, Nikhil Dey and Venkatesh Nayak among others, demanded that the text of the draft Data Protection Bill circulated by MEITY, which is being considered by the committee, should also be made public. "According to a note presented by the Attorney General to the Supreme Court in the ongoing cases related to Aadhaar, it appears that the committee is in possession of and considering a draft Data Protection Bill circulated by MietY. We request you to make public the draft which is being considered by the committee," the NCPRI said.

"Transparency in the functioning of the committee will boost public trust in this pre-legislative mechanism and will encourage people to engage with the issue of data protection," the civil society group urged.

 

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter