Online content rules face criticism

Industry, civil scoeity unhappy with indirect internet censorship

samirsachdeva

Samir Sachdeva | May 17, 2011



The new IT rules 2011 notified by the government last month have become a subject of criticism not only from civil society organisations on privacy concerns but also from the industry for making the intermediaries liable for the user-posted content.

The department of information technology (DIT) in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (zg) of subsection (2) of section 87 read with sub-section (2) of section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, has framed these rules. Section 79 authorises the government to define due diligence which an intermediary needs to follow while offering services but the government has gone far beyond that.

As per the new rules the intermediary has to inform the users not to host, display, upload, modify, publish, transmit, update or share any information that belongs to another person; is grossly harmful, harassing, blasphemous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, paedophilic, libellous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically objectionable, disparaging, relating or encouraging money laundering or gambling, or otherwise unlawful in any manner whatever; harm minors in any way; infringes any patent, trademark, copyright or other proprietary rights; violates any law for the time being in force; deceives or misleads the addressee about the origin of messages; impersonate another person; contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer resource; threatens the unity, integrity, defence, security or sovereignty of India, friendly relations with foreign states, or public order or causes incitement to the commission of any cognisable offence or prevents investigation of any offence or is insulting any other nation.

Further, the intermediaries have to appoint a grievance officer who can look into complaints on above parameters. These intermediaries have to remove a comment within 36 hours in case of complaint. In this case the user content generator will suffer as the intermediary will not give him opportunity to present his point of view and remove the content within 36 hours on individual complaint as per the new IT rules. 

The language of these rules (for example, a phrase like ‘objectionable content’) is open to widespread interpretation and put a huge responsibility on the intermediary. The rules, some argue, go against the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression. It will also increase compliance cost of industry and for intermediaries like Google, Rediff, Facebook, Yahoo, Twitter, YouTube, eBay, newspaper websites, matrimonial websites and so on. The information flow is so huge that it is practically impossible for the intermediary to monitor it. Also the user content has to be removed within 36 hours of complaint without listening to the user point-of-view will harm freedom of speech and expression.

The intermediaries are just providing a platform for users to post their views and holding them responsible for third party contents may not be in best interests of free speech.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Taming turbulence in Indian aviation

The booming Indian aviation industry, among the fastest growing sectors in the world, is projected to be valued at $40 billion by 2027. But, despite robust demand for air travel across the country, more than 50 airlines have closed down in the last decade in India and most private airlines have closed with

PM Modi leaves for G7 Summit in Italy

In his first foreign visit after taking oath of office for the third time, prime minister Narendra Modi Thursday evening left for Italy to participate in the G7 Outreach Summit. “At the invitation of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, I am travelling to Apulia region in Italy to participat

Some market talk, some gossip – learnings over tea at RBI

A Fly on the RBI Wall: An Insider’s View of the Central Bank By Alpana Killawala Rupa Publications, 248 pages, Rs 595  

Coalition politics not expected to impact India’s foreign policy

Prime minister Narendra Modi has strived incessantly to bring laurels and much needed recognition for the nation since May 2014 when he was sworn in as the head of state. The poser which can be deliberated upon is this: What will be the consequential impact of the new era of coalition politics which confro

New govt`s first decision pushes for farmer welfare

The BJP-led NDA government has started its term with its first decision relating to farmer welfare. Narendra Modi took charge of office as prime minister of India for the third time on Monday, a day after he and his colleagues were sworn in by the president of India. In his fi

Narendra Modi takes oath for third term

Narendra Modi made history Sunday evening as he was sworn in by president Droupadi Murmu for a third successive term. Modi thus becomes the first prime minister since Jawaharlal Nehru to have comptered two full terms and beginning a third consecutive term. In the swearing-in c

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter