Railway practice to “overcharge” goods customers unhealthy: Niti Aayog

Railways ends up treating its goods business as a tool to more than make up for its passenger business losses to manage overall financial situation, said a report

GN Bureau | September 15, 2016


#Surge Pricing   #Rail Budget   #Suresh Prabhu   #Indian Railways   #Railways   #Niti Aayog  


Niti Aayog, in its report Impact of 'Social Service Obligations' by Indian Railways, said that inefficiency in railways cost structure significantly contributes to the losses in passenger service business and hence tariff increase cannot be the only mechanism to address such social costs. It has to be necessarily complemented by cost optimization and non-fare box revenue enhancement strategies with varying levels for various classes.


Railways estimate indicate that financial impact of under recoveries due to lower tariff in non-suburban services is expected to be around Rs 28,000 crore, while a review indicates that this could more reasonably be around Rs 22,000 crore considering the competitive market dynamics in estimation.


The report, released on Wednesday, said that for AC classes, the average tariff levels are higher than equivalent fares for AC bus service. Hence, it is likely that losses in AC class are attributable to higher base cost structure of railways than to its fare structure. Railways would accordingly need to explore alternate cost optimization and expenditure control strategies to recover such losses.


For the year 2014-15, while railways passenger business incurred a net loss of about Rs 33,000 crores, its goods business made a profit of about Rs 44,500 crore.


“Effectively, IR (Indian Railways) ends up treating its goods business as a tool to more than make up for its passenger business losses to manage overall financial situation. This practice of “overcharging” goods customers is actually unhealthy for the net economy as higher goods tariffs are eventually passed on to common public in the form of higher electricity cost, higher cement, steel costs etc.


“This unfair practice also distorts the inter-modal share leading to customers preferring sub-optimal choice of modes such as roads. Therefore, looking at this matter in a holistic manner, it is suggested that measures to address social costs of passenger service business should necessarily be taken along with measures to rationalize goods tariff distortions.”


The report goes on to say that it can also be argued that Railway provides better services comparable to bus transportation for various classes. For example, AC and Sleeperclass in railways is generally considered better compared to the equivalent class in bus transport. For second class, train services are more or less comparable and possibly better for many cases than bus transport. Hence, in an ideal competitive environment, railways should be able to charge a commensurate premium in its tariffs reflecting service level differences.


Read the full report here

 

Comments

 

Other News

Amitav Ghosh’s new work: Connections between the word and the world

Wild Fictions: Essays By Amitav Ghosh HarperCollins, 496 pages, Rs 799.00 Amitav Ghosh, one of a handful of Ind

How markets can help (and also hinder) fight against pollution

In the annals of environmental policy, few ideas have been as transformative as the Emissions Trading System (ETS). Born from the minds of economists in the late 1960s, this market-based approach to pollution control has evolved from a theoretical concept to a global tool in the fight against climate chang

Will Bihar complement the resolution of Viksit Bharat 2047?

As India completes its diamond jubilee as a republic, I am reminded of a statement by Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, delivered during an address to the Bihar Chamber of Commerce in Patna on March 28, 2006. He said, “I have visited Bihar numerous times, and it has always been a source of happiness for me to

All you wanted to know about Budget: Key Highlights

Here are the key highlights of the proposal of the Union Budget presented in parliament by finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Satuday: NO INCOME TAX ON AVERAGE MONTHLY INCOME OF UPTO RS 1 LAKH; TO BOOST MIDDLE CLASS HOUSEHOLD SAVINGS & CONSUMPTION BENEFITTING

Four engines of development: Agriculture, MSME, investment & exports

Union minister of finance and corporate affairs Nirmala Sitharaman presented the Union Budget 2025-26 in Parliament on Saturday. Here is the summary of her budget speech, Part A: Quoting Telugu poet and playwright Shri Gurajada Appa Rao’s famous saying, ‘A country is not just its

No income tax on annual income up to Rs. 12 lakh

Reaffirming the government’s commitment to the philosophy of “trust first, scrutinize later”, the Union Budget 2025-26 has reposed faith in the middle class and continued the trend of giving relief in tax burden to the common taxpayer. Presenting the Budget in the Parliament on Saturday,

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now



Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter