Railways should compensate commuters: Court

geetanjali

Geetanjali Minhas | May 6, 2010



Taking a serious note of the railway motormen holding Mumbai to ransom with their strike, the Bombay High Court has asked the railways why motormen shouldn’t be made to pay compensation to commuters who were stranded.

“Ultimately the railway has to compensate and they can recover this money from striking employees,” observed a division bench of acting chief justice J N Patel and justice S C Dharamadhikari. “Railways should compensate them and recover the amount from motormen. You can easily identify the pass holders - at least they can be compensated.”

The court was  hearing a petition filed by the Union of India through the general manager, Western Railway, on the legality of motormen’s strike has now asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambatta to consult the centre on the compensation issue and file a reply by June 16.

Khambatta informed the court that the motormen had ‘deferred’ the strike till June 15 when a hearing is scheduled before the Industrial Court. The court has directed Khambatta to identify all motormen who went on strike and make every individual a respondent to the petition by May 7. These respondents will then have to file a reply by June 16.

Khambatta informed the court that recognised unions were not supporting the strike. He said that despite conciliatory proceedings underway before the Conciliatory Commissioner under the Industrial Disputes Act , the motormen had struck work.

Devendra Yadav, leader of the Joint Action Forum which had organised the, strike said, “If we are made to pay, we will defend ourselves. We gave the railways 22 days notice and they should have fulfilled our demands. If someone has to compensate it has to be the railways.”

“If political parties could be fined for organising bandhs and disrupting civic life, the same logic should apply in this case,” concluded Justice Patel.

Comments

 

Other News

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi

New pathways for tourism growth

Traditionally, India’s tourism policy has been based on three main components: the number of visitors, building tourist attractions and providing facilities for tourists. Due to the increase in climate-related issues and environmental destruction that occurred over previous years, policymakers have b

Is the US a superpower anymore?

On April 8, hours after warning that “a whole civilisation will die tonight,” US president Donald Trump, exhibiting his unique style of retreating from high-voltage brinkmanship, announced that he agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The weekend talks in Islamabad have failed and the futur

Machines communicate, humans connect

There is a moment every event professional knows—the kind that arrives without warning, usually an hour before the curtain rises. Months of meticulous planning are in place. And then comes the call: “We’ll also need a projector. For the slides.”   No email

Why India is entering a ‘stagflation lite’ phase

India’s macroeconomic narrative is quietly shifting—from a rare “Goldilocks” equilibrium of stable growth and contained inflation to a more fragile phase where external shocks are beginning to dominate domestic policy outcomes. The numbers still look reassuring at first glance: GDP


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter